Results for “United States Army”

…nd that group’s execution of its most sophisticated and deadly operation. Lastly, the district court found that “[t]he United States had not even been targeted by al Qaeda” when “defendants provided [Osama bin Laden] with funding” while “in Sudan during the early 1990’s.” SPA247...

… groundbreaking ceremony in Summit, N.J., for Celgene, the pharmaceutical company he led until stepping down to run for United States Senate. To his right are Representative Leonard Lance of New Jersey and former Gov. Chris Christie. Mel Evans/Associated Press","captionComponent"...

… “Golden Chain” document as one of al-Qaeda’s principal financiers. JA3164, 3866-67, 3869-70; see also supra pp. 56-60. United States intelligence agencies concluded that the seized materials were authentic al-Qaeda documents that chronicle the formation of al-Qaeda, detail its f...

…his agreement and is supported by independent consideration and that a breach of any one of these conditions allows the United States to elect to terminate the agreement and to investigate and prosecute Epstein and any other individual or entity for any and all federal offenses....

…aken the alliance, which all previous Israeli Prime- Ministers have safeguarded as a strategic asset of Israel. 6. The United States has failed to prevent countries like Pakistan or North Korea from obtaining nuclear weapons. This record feeds Israeli skepticism about a U.S. suc...

…re filed but were subject to the outer limit that the Government has at least "contemplated" charges. 7! Similarly, in United States v. Oakum, ” the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia considered a claim that CVRA rights did not apply until after a defendant had...

…is section, the Attorney General may, in his discretion, bring a civil action in an appropri- ate district court of the United States to enjoin such act or practice, and upon a proper showing, a permanent injunction or a temporary restraining order shall be granted without bond....

…ss unless a victim can provide a basis for recalculating the Guidelines or departing or varying from them. 74? 236 See United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). 237 See, e.g., United States v. Wilson, 350 F. Supp. 2d 910, 912 (D. Utah 2005) (giving "heavy weight" to Guide...

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida First Assistant U.S. Attorney 7 99 N.E. 4 Street Miami, FL 33132 (305) 961-9100 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE May 19, 2008 Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Stree...

…ssenting statute’s basic purposes,” ibid., as well as “‘the history of the times when it was passed,” Leo Sheep Co. v. United States, 440 U.S. 668, 669 (1979) (quoting United States v. Union Pacific R. Co., 91 U.S. 72, 79 1875)). In this case, historical context, purpose, and re...

… in accordance with section 7219 of this title. (3)(A) With respect to matters concerning the national security of the United States, no duty or liability under paragraph (2) of this subsec- tion shall be imposed upon any person acting in cooperation with the head of any Federal...

…08062 Serial 19 Enclosure(s): Enclosed for Miami is the server copy of the referenced Grand Jury subpoena issued by the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida on 10/06/2006 and served___________________________on 10/16/2006. Details: On 10/16/2006, SA received...

… the U.S. Supreme Court of each of these three principal holdings. In response to a request from the Supreme Court, the United States filed an amicus brief on May 29, 2009, expressing its views that this Court’s reasoning was flawed with respect to each of the holdings. Br. for t...

…ntries and U.S. states implemented a framework for legal cannabis access. There was also a presidential election in the United States; its ultimate impact on the cannabis industry remains uncertain. What did not happen since we launched our inaugural report? Federal legalization:...

…8-cv-80736-KAM Document 306 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2015 Page 1 of 19 JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, vs. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Defendant. _____________________________...