United States Judge for the District of Utah)
Results for “Utah Law Review”
Search across the indexed text of every released document.
Names that match “Utah Law Review”
2,437 documents found
Utah 84114; [email protected] to: Bradley J. Edwards
Utah (40 minutes from the Salt Lake City airport)
Page 2 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *863 as I argued at length in an earlier article. + After receiving my suggested changes, the Advisory Committee agreed with some, but declined to adopt many of the others. At issue for the Advisory Committee was whether to proceed narrowly by...
Page 52 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *933 409 _ and presumably they will be conferring But the CVRA already gives victims the right to "confer" with prosecutors regarding the important topic of sentencing. It is important to emphasize that my proposal would require prosecutors...
Page 58 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *942 that lawyers provide assistance to indigent criminal defendants. Presumably, that same power extends to requesting assistance for crime victims. +7 In light of all these facts, federal courts have the inherent power to request attorneys...
Page 43 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *920 Unless a statute or these rules permit otherwise, the government must prosecute an offense in a district where the offense was committed. The court must set the place of trial within the district with due regard for the convenience of th...
…motion and so, what happens with footnotes is if you identify it as footnote, put in a footnote where the University of Utah signature block is, for example, it becomes footnote 2, so then you have to create a different section and then once you have a different section you can e...
…13a45623c2b8bb5af61bd4e3a851> <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> Adventures in Utah with Austin-Lehman <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> Arches to Moab <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=15521091ff62...
Page 44 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *922 CVRA contemplates that the attorney for the government will consider the victim's mterests in exercising prosecutorial discretion, including the discretionary determination whether to consent to a Rule 20 transfer. The Subcommittee was n...
Page 16 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *883 representative. To eliminate any doubt about the ability of corporate entities to assert their interests, the Rules should be amended to clearly state that a victim's representative can enforce victims' rights. '73 Rule 2 - Fairness to...
Page 55 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *937 Focusing specifically on the issue of victim impact information, the [*938] Third Circuit 1s correct that, under the current rules, it is "unworkable" to provide advance notice of upward (or downward 44) departures based on victim allocu...
Page 49 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *929 (3) Sentence Recommendation. By local rule or by order in a case, the court may direct the probation officer not to disclose to anyone other than the court the officer's recommendation on the sentence. 39? I further recommended that vic...
Page 18 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *885 remains what the court should do with the victim's statement. Currently Rule 11(a)() specifies that the court must consider "the parties views on a nolo plea - but it makes no mention of the victim's views. !4? The CVRA now mandates that...
Page 17 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *884 ambiguous rules, but the Court has used it as a basis for deviating from the Rules in some circumstances. !4° Indeed, in some lower court cases, Rule 2 has proven outcome determinative. For example, in United States v. Broadus, the Unite...