Results for “Kenna”

…greed to."). 91 150 Cong. Rec. H8208-09 (daily ed. Oct. 6, 2004). 92 150 Cong. Rec. S10910 (daily ed. Oct. 9, 2004). 93 Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1015-16 (9th Cir. 2006) (internal quotations and citations omitted); accord United States...

…stated tersely that the district court did not "commit legal error." 40° Although strong arguments can be made against Kenna, 4°” the case is not on point to my proposal. First, Kenna involved a claim of a "general right" to access to the presentence report, apparently untethere...

…eak at sentencing, as the only courts to have reached the issue have held. 43° For [*940] instance, in United States v. Kenna, Judge Kozinski ‘4° explained that the CVRA's legislative history "discloses a clear congressional intent to give crime victims the right to speak at proc...

Page 57 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *940 Based on this legislative history, Kenna concluded that crime victims have the right to speak at CVRA-covered proceedings. 445 Kenna explained that this interpretation advanced the purposes of the CVRA, for the "statute was enacted to [*...

…reed to."). °! 150 Cong. Rec. H8208-09 (daily ed. Oct. 6, 2004). °2 150 Cong. Rec. $10910 (daily ed. Oct. 9, 2004). % Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1015-16 (9th Cir. 2006) (internal quotations and citations omitted); accord United States...

… plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding"). Under the CVRA, courts may not limit victims to a written statement. See Kenna v. United States District Court, 435 F.3d 1011, 1017 (9th Cir. 2006) (Kozinski, J.) ("Limiting victims to written impact statements, while allowing the pr...

… & VASILY JOHN M & HOFFER NATASHA I RUTHERFURD ELIZABETH K MINSKY HOWARD G & SYLVIA BOWDEN ELIZABETH M & GERBETH JOHN MCKENNA PAUL J & FERGUSON JOHN M & LIST THOMAS & BARBARA MARA ANN T POLZIN NANCY DOUGLAS MC CLOSKEY MARGERY BURTCH DEAN C & HALPER HARRY A & SYLVIA S OBRIEN TERRE...

…the reported cases under the CVRA thus far show few examples where the government has been willing to do so. See, e.g., Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1018 (9th Cir. 2006) (victims' assertion of right affirmed; government does not take a pos...

…ims were entitled to reg- ular appellate review. See In re W.R. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., 409 F.3d 555, 562 (2d Cir. 2005); Kenna v. US. Dist. Ct. for the Cent. Dist. of Ca., 435 F.3d 1011, 1017 (9th Cir. 2006); In re Walsh, 229 Fed.Appx. 58, at 60 (8rd Cir. 2007). My next question...

…ctims were entitled to regular appellate review. See /n re W.R,. Hufl Asset Mgmt. Co.,409 F.3d 555, 562 (2d Cir. 2005); Kenna, u. US. Dist. Ct. for the Cent. Dist. of Ca., 435 F.3d 1011, 1017 (9th Cir. 2006): In re Walsh, 229 Fed.Appx. 58, at 60 (3rd Cir. 2007). My next question...