Epstein Suite
Full-text search

Results for “Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals”

Search across the indexed text of every released document.

Names that match “Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals”

BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO · 67 Supreme Court · 23 U.S. District Court · 14 Court · 14 THE COURT · 8 Palm Beach County Circuit Court · 6

2,729 documents found

All First Year Law Students At Yale Are Required To Participate In A Moot Court Competition. My Opponent Was A Classmate Named Taft
document All first year law students at Yale are required to participate in a moot court competition. My opponent was a classmate named Taft House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

one of whose ancestors was the President of the United States and the Chief Justice; another a senator from Ohio and the third the mayor of Cincinnati. It is fair to say at that time that Taft was one of the most prominent names in America. My mother was convinced that I couldn...

In The Coming Pages I Will Describe A Series Of Pornography Cases I Have Litigated. In Several Of Them
document In the coming pages I will describe a series of pornography cases I have litigated. In several of them House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

…mes’ aphorism . . . applies with equal force to pornography.” Another court analogized “picketing . . . in support of a secondary boycott” to shouting “Fire!” because in both instances “speech and conduct are brigaded.”

In Those Days
document In those days House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

a challenge to the constitutionality of a state statute could be brought in front of a three judge district court with the right to appeal its ruling directly to the Supreme Court. The criteria for bringing such a challenge

It Was The First Time In History That A Court—Any Court—Had Ruled That The Government Had No Power To Ban Or Prosecute An “Obscene” Film That Was Shown To The Public In A Theater. I Had Achieved A Total Victory Not Only For My Client
document It was the first time in history that a court—any court—had ruled that the government had no power to ban or prosecute an “obscene” film that was shown to the public in a theater. I had achieved a total victory not only for my client House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

but for my novel approach to offensiveness under the First Amendment. It was a heck of a way to begin my career as a lawyer. The victory would

A Few Months Later The Supreme Court Rendered A 5 To 3 Decision In The I Am Curious Yellow Case That Did Not Reach The Broad Issue Decided By The District Court (Nor Did It Mention Bear Baiting); Instead
document A few months later the Supreme Court rendered a 5 to 3 decision in the I Am Curious Yellow case that did not reach the broad issue decided by the district court (nor did it mention bear-baiting); instead House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

it decided the case on a narrow procedural ground. We eventually settled the case to the advantage of the defendants. The film was shown throughout the country and no one went to prison. Judge Aldrich’s opinion