In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001., 2012 WL 257568 (2012) remaining defendants, who allegedly held more junior positions in foreign governments, was unclear. Struggling to interpret the precise meaning of Terrorist Attacks III's personal jurisdiction holding, plaint...
Results for “Robert Court”
Search across the indexed text of every released document.
Names that match “Robert Court”
2,293 documents found
In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001., 2012 WL 257568 (2012) present at the time of death or injury to recover under NIED. Bovsun, 61 N.Y.2d at 233. Here, plaintiffs -- many of them the surviving family members of 9/11 victims -- allege that the defendants’ knowing mat...
IN RE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 811 Cite as 349 F.Supp.2d 765 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253, 78 §.Ct. 1228, 2 L.Ed.2d 1288 (1958)). [52] For purposes of the minimum con- tacts inquiry, a distinction is made be- tween specific and general j...
Page 51 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *932 In addition, an independent basis for victims reviewing presentence reports is the victim's broad right under the CVRA to be "treated with fairness" 4°? and right to restitution, as I argued in my earlier article. 4 Thus, the CVRA shou...
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 96 H3vlgiu2 THE COURT: Well, what do you say about the case that's been cited? MS. SCHULTZ: Well, about Adelson? I would say that it's factually distinguished because here she is two days later reiterating...
Page Page Page Page Page Page Page 311 312 313 314 BL 316 317 AA A AD A A A Court Court Court Court Court Court Court Seal Seal Seal Seal Seal Seal Seal ling ling ling ling ling ling ling Order; Order; Order; Order; Order; Order; Order; KKAMAKKAKAMAMKKAAKAAMAMAKKA Xx x x...
796 argue the Court’s adjudication of Plaintiffs’ claims would interfere with the executive branch’s discretion to designate state sponsors of terror. See 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7)(A) (isting statutes that give Secretary of State authority to designate countries as sponsors of terr...
Page 56 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *939 both approved broadening that rule to give all victims the right to speak. “87 (The Judicial Conference withdrew this proposed rule to allow reconsideration in light of the CVRA.) The CVRA gave victims the right to be "reasonably heard"...
In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001., 2012 WL 257568 (2012) necessary to mount a significant transborder attack. See JA3777-78. In particular, plaintiffs alleged that support during that crucial period enabled al-Qaeda to expand its footprint, train terrorists, plot a...
Page 61 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *946 The Advisory Committee's next argument is that to allow victims to be heard on dismissals would violate the CVRA's requirement that nothing in the Act "shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General." 4...
January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2002.” Defendant is seeking personal diary information during the time this non-party was a minor child and a victim of sexual trafficking. There is no reason this non-party should be forced to produce her diary from when she was a child. See Peis...
BACKGROUND The underlying action before this Court is a defamation case filed by a former federal judge, Paul Cassell, and his colleague Brad Edwards, who represent various sexual trafficking victims in a case pending in the Southern District of Florida, specifically case no. 08...
Page 46 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *913 clearly apply to victims. Illustrative of these decisions is the thoughtful analysis by the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in Bothwell v. Republic Tobacco Co. 3!? Bothwell presented four grounds for its holding that co...
… series on poetry and science now running with award-winning magazine Nautilus, a collaboration with distinguished poet Robert Pinsky and his Favorite Poem Project, and an expansion of our poetry film series with partners at The Nantucket Project. Advised by a stellar and diverse...
…nd we argued that they were no different, as a matter of law, from nude photographs taken by recognized artists such as Robert Mapplethorpe, Sally Mann and David Hamilton that were exhibited in museums. I won that case and several others like it. 133 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017240