Results for “Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 57(b”

…al progress against an ingrained tradition of underenforcement without turning to any model of enforcement redundancy - federalization, private prosecution, or judicial review. That is more than state justice systems were ever able to do with regard to local government corruption...

Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 168/Tuesday, August 30, 2011/Rules and Regulations 54013 But even if the new rule is understood to compel employer speech, Section 8(c) ‘““merely implements the First Amendment.” Brown, 554 U.S. at 67 (quoting NLEB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 5...

Page 60 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *945 In light of the statutory statement in /8 U.S.C. § 377/(d)(6) that nothing in the CVRA "shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General," as well as the separation of powers issues raised by judicial rev...

…s, "neither [Rule 16(a)] governing information subject to disclosure by the Government in criminal cases, nor any other federal rule or statute requires the Government to supply names of potential 3 ie) 7 See id. § 3500(b); see also Fed. R. Crim. P. 26.2 (integrating Jencks Ac...

… than giving the defendant the name and address of victim." 7° This note raises a host of problems. Most importantly, a federal court lacks jurisdiction to require a crime victim to appear at a face-to-face, pretrial [*898] meeting with the defendant. n 207 The "federal courts...

112 6 A Brief Overview of CogPrime through its logic rules, so that uncertain premises give rise to conclusions with reasonably accurately estimated uncertainty values. This careful management of uncertainty is critical for the application of logical inference in the robotics co...

…** a power that would seem to extend to criminal cases. Indeed, the Supreme Court has left open the question of whether federal courts possess the inherent authority to require counsel [*942] to provide legal services to the poor. ** The local rules of some federal courts already...

…antial evidence that an identifiable person has been directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia, and in the judgment of the officer or employee, that person is a putative victim of that offense. Th...

…It was passed in 1995. It was bipartisan. I was a cosponsor in the House of Representatives. It is an effort to require Federal regulators to evaluate the cost of rules, to look at the benefits and the costs, and to look at less costly alternatives on rules. The two amendments I...

…at the arguments about the victim's right to fairness here, other than to note that the "preferred" trial method in the federal courts is a jury trial. 78° Why it is fair to deviate from that preferred method without first listening to the victims is not immediately clear. But,...

… FDA has not published detailed guidance about its cannabis-related enforcement priorities. Bank Secrecy Act and Other Federal Laws Regarding Financial Transactions Financial transactions in connection with cannabis-related CSA violations may implicate federal laws other than t...

…als even if they would [*866] be called as witnesses. !° In its most sweeping recommendation, the Task Force proposed a federal constitutional amendment to protect crime victims’ rights "to be present and to be heard at all critical stages of judicial proceedings." |! In the wak...

…the plaintiffs' then-emergency petition for cement of the Crime Victim Rights Act, the CVRA was not violated because no federal charges were ever filed in the lem District of Florida," Valle said. "Because the matter remains pending in court, it would be inappropriate at this tim...

Page 23 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *873 number even without any showing of need. Nothing in the rule, however, would bar the defendant from requesting that information by filing an appropriate motion. The court could then determine whether any such motion had merit. !7° [*87...

Page 44 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *922 CVRA contemplates that the attorney for the government will consider the victim's mterests in exercising prosecutorial discretion, including the discretionary determination whether to consent to a Rule 20 transfer. The Subcommittee was n...