Results for “The Supreme Court”

the court published the decision reversing Sybers

this Court held that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act’s (“FSIA”) torts exception

plaintiffs conceded before the district court that

the court reasoned that “a potential finding as to NCB’s sovereign status would simply result *154 in NCB being

this Court has overruled Terrorist Attacks

the Court accepts as true the facts alleged in

[to stand with other counsel in the well of the court

the rules should also reflect victims' rights to attend court

based on a decision of this Court construing 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(5)

approximately 90 initial Rule 12 motions remained pending before the district court. Following Terrorist Attacks III

this Court issued its decision in Doe v. Bin Laden

plaintiffs moved this Court to summarily vacate the dismissals in favor of defendants’ SRC

the district court declined to apply hornbook tort principles in concluding that defendants owed no “duty of care” to plaintiffs

where the pleadings contained detailed allegations that they provided material support to al-Qaeda. A stark example is the district court’s failure to infer that Al Rajhi Bank knew or had reason to know that it was providing financial services to al-Qaeda

which only require that a plaintiff plead facts that permit “the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Iqbal