the court reasoned that “a potential finding as to NCB’s sovereign status would simply result *154 in NCB being
Results for “U.S. Bankruptcy Court”
Search across the indexed text of every released document.
Names that match “U.S. Bankruptcy Court”
1,704 documents found
this Court has overruled Terrorist Attacks
the Court accepts as true the facts alleged in
[to stand with other counsel in the well of the court
the rules should also reflect victims' rights to attend court
based on a decision of this Court construing 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(5)
approximately 90 initial Rule 12 motions remained pending before the district court. Following Terrorist Attacks III
this Court issued its decision in Doe v. Bin Laden
plaintiffs moved this Court to summarily vacate the dismissals in favor of defendants’ SRC
the district court declined to apply hornbook tort principles in concluding that defendants owed no “duty of care” to plaintiffs
where the pleadings contained detailed allegations that they provided material support to al-Qaeda. A stark example is the district court’s failure to infer that Al Rajhi Bank knew or had reason to know that it was providing financial services to al-Qaeda
which only require that a plaintiff plead facts that permit “the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Iqbal
the district court itself recognized that under New York law
“Sovereign Defendants”) and National Commercial Bank (“NCB”) -- and remand for jurisdictional discovery on the basis of this Court’s recent *152 holding in Doe v. Bin Laden
this Court held that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act’s (“FSIA”) torts exception