Epstein Suite
Full-text search

Results for “One&Only Palmilla”

Search across the indexed text of every released document.

Names that match “One&Only Palmilla”

ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO · 17 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO · 5 Air Force One · 4 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS CURVE CONDO · 3 One Bryant Park · 3 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO · 3

9,699 documents found

My Good Memory Went Mostly To Waste In My Early Years
document My good memory went mostly to waste in my early years House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

because there was so little worth remembering. We would be given a quarter to memorize passages from holy texts and a dollar if we could recite “by heart” (what does that mean?) an entire chapter from the Bible. Only once did my memory serve me well during my adolescence

My First Case Involved A Man Named “Daniel Jackson Oliver Wendell Holmes Morgan”—Quite A Name! Any Lawyer Would Be Proud To Have Been Named After. “Daniel Webster
document My first case involved a man named “Daniel Jackson Oliver Wendell Holmes Morgan”—Quite a name! Any lawyer would be proud to have been named after. “Daniel Webster House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

” “Andrew Jackson” and “Oliver Wendell Holmes.” That’s what Mr. Morgan thought too. The only problem was he wasn’t a lawyer and that wasn’t his name! He was an uneducated

Justice Goldberg Always Wanted Me To Become A Judge
document Justice Goldberg always wanted me to become a judge House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

perhaps even a Justice. I never had any interest in wearing a robe since judging requires the kind of passivity that is not suitable to my temperament. I was surprised that Justice Goldberg was so insistent since he himself had left the bench after only 3 years. I don’t think...

I Decided On A Bold Challenge To The Traditional Power Of The Government To Censor Obscene Material—Indeed To Censor Any “Offensive” Material Shown Only To People Who Aren’t Offended By It. Instead Of Arguing That The Film Itself Was Not Obscene
document I decided on a bold challenge to the traditional power of the government to censor obscene material—indeed to censor any “offensive” material shown only to people who aren’t offended by it. Instead of arguing that the film itself was not obscene House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

I decided to argue that it was none of the government’s constitutional business to act as a board of censors—to tell its adult citizens what they could and could not watch in the privacy of a movie theater that was off limits to children and that did not advertise in a pandering...

Judge Aldrich Immediately Expressed Skepticism About The Reach Of My Argument
document Judge Aldrich immediately expressed skepticism about the reach of my argument House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

suggesting that the Stanley decision wasn’t relevant to a movie theater. He told me about his grandmother who “once went to a movie entitled Sur Les Troits de Paris. She thought it was a travelogue. She didn’t after she got there of course…I heard about it.” I assured him tha...

It Was The First Time In History That A Court—Any Court—Had Ruled That The Government Had No Power To Ban Or Prosecute An “Obscene” Film That Was Shown To The Public In A Theater. I Had Achieved A Total Victory Not Only For My Client
document It was the first time in history that a court—any court—had ruled that the government had no power to ban or prosecute an “obscene” film that was shown to the public in a theater. I had achieved a total victory not only for my client House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

but for my novel approach to offensiveness under the First Amendment. It was a heck of a way to begin my career as a lawyer. The victory would

We Categorically Disapprove The Theory…That Obscene
document We categorically disapprove the theory…that obscene House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

pornographic films acquire constitutional immunity from state regulation simply because they are exhibited for consenting adults only…The States have a long-recognized legitimate interest in the quality of life and the total community environment

Only Hours Before The Scheduled Performance
document Only hours before the scheduled performance House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

Carl Stork and Nathan J. Hagen—the co-presidents of the Quincy House Film Society—received telephone calls from the D.A.’s office directing them to be in Judge Charles R. Alberti’s courtroom at two o’clock for a hearing. Stork and Hagen tried to call me in my office. But I was...

Not Only Has The Verdict Of History Condemned The Words Of The Sedition Act
document Not only has the verdict of history condemned the words of the Sedition Act House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

it has also condemned the selective manner in which it was enforced against certain journalists and newspapers but not others. If there are to be any restrictions of freedom in the press

I Strongly Favor A Narrow Code To A Potentially Broad Common Law
document I strongly favor a narrow code to a potentially broad common-law House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

because it provides advanced fair warning and an opportunity to challenge the provisions of the code before they are enforced. (That’s why I also favor a narrow code criminalizing the publication of only the most dangerous state secrets).

Ad: My Purposes Are The Purposes Of The First Amendment. Mr. Hale
document AD: My purposes are the purposes of the First Amendment. Mr. Hale House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

you will rue the day that you ever thought that I would give you publicity because I will not stop condemning your organization and you know that the only condition that I will accept your case is because you have given me the freedom to argue with you

Whenever A Holocaust Denier Or Defamer Of The Jews Spews Out His Poison
document Whenever a Holocaust denier or defamer of the Jews spews out his poison House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

I get calls and emails demanding that I sue them for defaming the Jewish people or committing a “blood libel.” But under our First Amendment only an individual can be defamed. There is no such thing as group libel. In other words you can say all you want about “the Jews

The Complex Issues Surrounding The War Against Terrorists Plays Out Not Only On The Battlefields Of Iraq And Afghanistan
document The complex issues surrounding the war against terrorists plays out not only on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

but in Israel and Gaza as well. I stand ready to defend Israeli soldiers and commanders who have been falsely accused of killing Palestinian civilians in their efforts to protect Israeli civilians from terrorist rocket attacks. In 2011