Results for “United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia”

the district court noted that Al Rajhi Bank “submits it

in the court in the district in which the crime occurred."" Judge Jones said the Crime Victims Rights

the Fifth District Court of Appeal rejected the application of the

the district court drew upon public awareness that Iraq supported suicide bombers in Israel to “infer that ...

after Talansky gave evidence in Jerusalem’s District Court. Though he

the district court’s rulings are based on fundamental legal

plaintiffs conceded before the district court that

approximately 90 initial Rule 12 motions remained pending before the district court. Following Terrorist Attacks III

the district court declined to apply hornbook tort principles in concluding that defendants owed no “duty of care” to plaintiffs

where the pleadings contained detailed allegations that they provided material support to al-Qaeda. A stark example is the district court’s failure to infer that Al Rajhi Bank knew or had reason to know that it was providing financial services to al-Qaeda

the district court itself recognized that under New York law

plaintiffs conceded before the district court that

the district court dismissed the case for lack of

102 (2d Cir. 1998) (vacating the district court’s dismissal of a claim because of “a change in the law during the

and the district court acknowledged that recovery could