Full-text search

Results for “Camden Fine”

Search across the indexed text of every released document.

327 documents found

During Discussion On The Motion
document During discussion on the motion House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

Ms. Duemler stated she believed the retroactive fine was a little harsh. Mr. Ballentine said he agreed and asked what the reason for the retroactive fine was. Mr. Ochstein said there are so many people who do work without a permit and they know they need a permit. That is a ve...

Mr. Ochstein Remarked That The Fine Was Around $35
document Mr. Ochstein remarked that the fine was around $35 House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

000 and the house was on the market for $10.6 million dollars so he did not see the hardship. Mr. Lynch said he did not know the price but he would accept Mr. Ochstein’s statement on that. Mr. Lynch said the hardship was in the imposition of the fine itself

the researchers fine-tuned their regimen of egg-stimulating drugs so that more of the women produced
document The OHSU scientists also studied which batches of donated eggs were most likely to thrive and survive long enough to produce stem cells. Finding that eggs fared best when they were part of a medium-sized harvest House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

the researchers fine-tuned their regimen of egg-stimulating drugs so that more of the women produced about 10 eggs per cycle.

acceptance of the payment of the fine and no further action be taken
document Code Enforcement Officer Weymer presented the facts of the case and said the fine of $250.00 had been paid prior to today’s meeting. He said the Town recommended a finding of non-compliance House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

acceptance of the payment of the fine and no further action be taken.