Full-text search

Results for “Magistrate Judge Orenstein”

Search across the indexed text of every released document.

589 documents found

At The End Of The Year
document At the end of the year House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

the clerks would prepare bound volumes of all the opinions we worked on during our clerkship. One was given to the judge and the others to us

The Opinions Of Judge Bazelon Over The Years Had The Laid The Foundation For This Decision And Several Of Them Were Cited In The Briefs Filed By His Friends Abe Fortas And Abe Krash
document The opinions of Judge Bazelon over the years had the laid the foundation for this decision and several of them were cited in the briefs filed by his friends Abe Fortas and Abe Krash House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

who had been appointed to Represent Gideon. (My friend John Hart Ely was working for the Fortas firm during the summer the briefs were being prepared and I reviewed and edited several drafts with John.) Bazelon’s opinions—more often dissents than majority—had established the co...

Justice Goldberg Always Wanted Me To Become A Judge
document Justice Goldberg always wanted me to become a judge House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

perhaps even a Justice. I never had any interest in wearing a robe since judging requires the kind of passivity that is not suitable to my temperament. I was surprised that Justice Goldberg was so insistent since he himself had left the bench after only 3 years. I don’t think...

The Star Student In My First Year Class Was A Woman From New York Who Eventually Became A Distinguished Judge. She Received An A Grade On The Final Exam. Three Of Her Other First Year Teachers Also Gave Her A Grades
document The star student in my first year class was a woman from New York who eventually became a distinguished judge. She received an A grade on the final exam. Three of her other first year teachers also gave her A grades House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

but her contracts teacher gave her a D. She came to me upset about her D grade and asked me to read her exam. I read it and it was clearly of A quality. I was sure that her contracts professor had simply made a transcription error and so I went to his office to discuss it. He...

In Those Days
document In those days House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

a challenge to the constitutionality of a state statute could be brought in front of a three judge district court with the right to appeal its ruling directly to the Supreme Court. The criteria for bringing such a challenge

Judge Aldrich Immediately Expressed Skepticism About The Reach Of My Argument
document Judge Aldrich immediately expressed skepticism about the reach of my argument House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

suggesting that the Stanley decision wasn’t relevant to a movie theater. He told me about his grandmother who “once went to a movie entitled Sur Les Troits de Paris. She thought it was a travelogue. She didn’t after she got there of course…I heard about it.” I assured him tha...

As Judge Aldrich Continued To Press Me About His Grandmother’s Sensibilities
document As Judge Aldrich continued to press me about his grandmother’s sensibilities House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

I was reminded of the old Jewish joke about the man with the broken watch who goes into a storefront window and asks the man behind the counter to fix his watch. “I don’t fix watches. I perform circumcisions

When I Then Advised The Court That Under My Theory
document When I then advised the court that under my theory House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

the judges would not have to view the film. Judge Aldrich immediately interjected: “Are you trying to bribe us to decide the case so we don’t have to see the film?...I will admit that’s the best bribe I have ever been offered.”

Following Three Days Of Intensive Argument And Questioning
document Following three days of intensive argument and questioning House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

the three judges issued a decision written by Judge Aldrich. He bought my argument totally. He began by accepting my assumption about the nature of the film:

A Few Months Later The Supreme Court Rendered A 5 To 3 Decision In The I Am Curious Yellow Case That Did Not Reach The Broad Issue Decided By The District Court (Nor Did It Mention Bear Baiting); Instead
document A few months later the Supreme Court rendered a 5 to 3 decision in the I Am Curious Yellow case that did not reach the broad issue decided by the district court (nor did it mention bear-baiting); instead House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

it decided the case on a narrow procedural ground. We eventually settled the case to the advantage of the defendants. The film was shown throughout the country and no one went to prison. Judge Aldrich’s opinion

But As I Promised Judge Aldrich
document But as I promised Judge Aldrich House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

I continued to press my principle in the court of public opinion and in a series of other obscenity cases over the next several decades. Ultimately my view would prevail

Only Hours Before The Scheduled Performance
document Only hours before the scheduled performance House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

Carl Stork and Nathan J. Hagen—the co-presidents of the Quincy House Film Society—received telephone calls from the D.A.’s office directing them to be in Judge Charles R. Alberti’s courtroom at two o’clock for a hearing. Stork and Hagen tried to call me in my office. But I was...

Notwithstanding The Judge’s Ruling That The Film Was Not Obscene
document Notwithstanding the judge’s ruling that the film was not obscene House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

the District Attorney decided to arrest Stork and Hagen. The Deep Throat case was so important to Droney that he pulled one state detective off a murder investigation to watch the film and make the arrest.

Many Years After New York Times V. Sullivan
document Many years after New York Times v. Sullivan House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

I myself was charged with defamation—indeed criminal defamation—for exercising my own freedom of speech to criticize a judge for an opinion she wrote. This certainly made me appreciate our First Amendment. Here is the story:

I Understood His Reference To “The Numbers” As Meaning Two Different Things: First The Numbers On The Supreme Court
document I understood his reference to “the numbers” as meaning two different things: First the numbers on the Supreme Court House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

which now might be 5-4 against us. And the large number of condemned inmates who faced execution on a theory similar to that which had lead the sentencing judge in Arizona to sentence the Tison brothers to die even though they had not killed the Lyons family or intended their de...