4.2.12 WC: 191694 the warning to evildoers in Romans 13:4, that God had appointed ministers on earth to carry out his wrath against them. He believed it was his mission to conduct “search and destroy” operations against the porno industry. As a prosecutor of pornography, he had...
Results for “Florida Supreme Court”
Search across the indexed text of every released document.
Names that match “Florida Supreme Court”
2,223 documents found
4.2.12 WC: 191694 concern and interest in the broader community by political activity or volunteer work among the sick or underprivileged; and whether he had manifested leadership, industry, perseverance, self-discipline and intense motivation. Moreover, if petitioner were to c...
4.2.12 WC: 191694 We categorically disapprove the theory...that obscene, pornographic films acquire constitutional immunity from state regulation simply because they are exhibited for consenting adults only... The States have a long-recognized legitimate interest in the quality...
4.2.12 WC: 191694 David Ben Gurion.” The next day they were on a plane to Israel, and that afternoon Kronheim was standing on the balcony of the Prime Minister’s house being photographed. “Ok, here’s the final challenge: maybe among Jews and Americans, you’re famous, but you'll...
4.2.12 WC: 191694 This situation was different; because the only purpose of publishing the child’s photograph was to call attention to his penis. Moreover, his parents had not consented their child to being photographed by a paparazzi on an isolated beach, and so the family’s pr...
IN RE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 795 Cite as 349 F.Supp.2d 765 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) § 1605(a)(7) state sponsor of terrorism claim into a § 1605(a)(5) tort claim. With respect to Prince Sultan’s and Prince Turki's arguments that the entire tort, meaning both the tortio...
anticipating its own demise and what consequences that might bring. It believes that in the inevitable Supreme Court battle that would follow a direct attempt by the President to fire the Special Counsel, the Court would surely rebuff such an expansion of Presidential authority....
Page 12 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *854 such conclusion would be contrary to the plain language of the CVRA. |!° To avoid possible confusion, the rules should be clear on this point. An additional reason for integrating victims into the federal rules is that Congress seeming...
https://nyti.ms/2D6krmw TECHNOLOGY Peter Thiel’s Money Talks, in Contentious Ways. But What Does He Say? By DAVID STREITFELD MARCH 7, 2018 Peter Thiel is Silicon Valley’s homegrown Cassandra. He warned for years that the big tech companies were arrogant and clueless and less goo...
Page 40 of 42 103 Minn. L. Rev. 844, *913 not unique hybrid: it provides independent review removed from local electoral politics, yet power remains in the hands of 213, U.S. Attorneys and the U.S. Attorney General are political appointees, U.S. Const. art. II, § 2 (Appointment...
IN RE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 799 Cite as 349 F.Supp.2d 765 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) proximate cause, and in tort law, a defen- dant will be held liable only for those injuries that might have reasonably been anticipated as a natural consequence of the defendant’s actio...
102 CASSELL ET AL. [Vol. 104 contained in a police file in a civil proceeding, even though it appears that there was little indication that criminal charges had been filed.”*8 Similarly, the South Carolina Supreme Court, while limiting the ability of the victim to challenge the...
those advocating censorship have cited a state supreme court that held that “Holmes’ aphorism . . . applies with equal force to pornography.” Another court analogized “picketing . . . in support of a secondary boycott” to shouting “Fire!” because in both instances “speech and con...
a challenge to the constitutionality of a state statute could be brought in front of a three judge district court with the right to appeal its ruling directly to the Supreme Court. The criteria for bringing such a challenge
it decided the case on a narrow procedural ground. We eventually settled the case to the advantage of the defendants. The film was shown throughout the country and no one went to prison. Judge Aldrich’s opinion