Full-text search

Results for “Dep't of Justice”

Search across the indexed text of every released document.

891 documents found

Professor Rodel Was So Concerned That I Might Contaminate The Elderly Justice Black That He Took The Train To Washington To Try To Persuade Him To Reject The Recommendation Of His Recent Law Clerk. In The End
document Professor Rodel was so concerned that I might contaminate the elderly Justice Black that he took the train to Washington to try to persuade him to reject the recommendation of his recent law clerk. In the end House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

Justice Black told Professor Calabresi that he had to defer to his friend's veto for that year but that he would consider me for the following year. This was the best possible news because it allowed me to accept a clerkship with Judge David Bazelon on the United States Court of...

This Is Not To Suggest That Justice Should Remain Blind To The Existence Of A Real Emergency Endangering The Survival Of The Nation. As Justice Arthur Goldberg Once Wrote: “While The Constitution Protects Against The Invasion Of Individual Rights
document This is not to suggest that justice should remain blind to the existence of a real emergency endangering the survival of the nation. As Justice Arthur Goldberg once wrote: “While the Constitution protects against the invasion of individual rights House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

it is not a suicide pact.” But it is precisely during times of crisis—when the balance between momentary expediency and enduring safeguards often goes askew—that courts can perform their most critical function: to preserve or restore a sense of perspective.

Chief Justice Earl Warren had written in Trop v. Dulles (1958) that “whatever the arguments may be a
document I set to work on the capital punishment project but found no suggestion in the case law that any court had ever considered the death penalty to be of questionable constitutionality. Just five years earlier House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

Chief Justice Earl Warren had written in Trop v. Dulles (1958) that “whatever the arguments may be against capital punishment

rather than because [I] had any real sense that justice in some way had gone astray.”
document Esquire magazine had commented that the Von Bulow appeal “looked like another ritualistic exercise in civil libertarian dogma” that “would churn through the courts simply because there was money available and a set of arguments that could be made House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

rather than because [I] had any real sense that justice in some way had gone astray.”