Results for “U.S. Courts of the District of Columbia Circuit”

Case 1:16-cv-04642 Document1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 3 of 9 and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NY Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and constitute the torts of, inter alia, as...

Cite as: 586 U.S. (2019) 13 BREYER, J., dissenting 1502. Some of these organizations, including the International Finance Corporation (IFC), themselves believe they do not need broad immunity in commercial areas, and they have waived it. See, e.g., Articles of Agreement of the...

… relationships. For that reason a few states assign such cases to state-level, rather than local, officials. 7° And the U.S. Justice Department attempts to collect data on deaths in jails, prison, or during [#904] attempted arrests, to facilitate Justice Department oversight. ?°4...

measure of risk, a factor that both juvenile and adult courts should be using to determine their sentencing, especially the individual’s future dangerousness. Individual differences in glucose metabolism, together with relative differences in brain activity, lead to stable diffe...

…ghts found in the CVRA. ® See infra Part I.C. 7 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 6 (emphasis added) (quoting /8 U.S.C. § 3771 (a)(2)). 8 150 Cong. Rec. 7295 (2004) (statement of Sen. Dianne Feinstein). ° OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 7-8, 10 (quoting 78 U.S.C. §...

found themselves accountable to Congress and the courts. Any

it does not forbid further dissemination. Several federal courts have held that circulation of reports to third

and the courts may well serve as a brake on such

courts must order narrow redactions where possible to avoid overbroad

” and courts routinely enter protective orders to

and the attorney for the Government ... .""_ 28 The courts were also required under the Act

redundancy in state law charging by courts or

courts in other common law jurisdictions - notably Canada

some trial courts simply overlooked the victim's right to attend - most notoriously in the Oklahoma

courts decided for themselves whether to