Results for “District Court”

…LSD Docket 02/02/2015 Page 1 of 19 JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, vs. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Defendant. ________________________________________/ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION...

… noted in a 2016 response filed in the case. In February, the Miami Herald filed a federal court motion in the Southern District of New York, seeking access to documents that were sealed in the Maxwell case. The motion, which was not opposed by Roberts, could have cast light on t...

…ourse. As part of the resolution of the case, Epstein has agreed that he would not contest jurisdiction in the Southern District of Florida for any victim who chose to sue him for damages pursuant to 18 USC 2255. Mr. Epstein agreed to provide an attorney for victims who elected t...

…, attorneys representing two of his alleged victims, say in the filing that the U.S. Attorney's office for the Southern District of Florida of deliberately misled the victims by telling them there was an ongoing investigation into their claims. However, they say, the office was c...

…as "inaccurately described the agreement ... creating a false impression that the agreement protects the victims." U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra ruled that the claims, even if true, haven't damaged Edwards' case. "If and when such alleged mischaracterizations become relevant...

…r rights either in the court in which formal charges had already been filed ,,or, if no prosecution is underwag, in the district court in the district in which the crime occurred." 18 U.S.C. gBZTI(dXB) (emphasis added). Despite Congress'clear intention to extend. rights to crime...

…ty operating as an alter-ego of the Saudi government, also under the FSIA. SPA76-77, 81, 98. On December 16, 2005, the district court certified as final pursuant to Rule 54(b) its orders of January 18, 2005, May 5, 2005, and September 21, 2005 with respect to the Kingdom, Prince...

…tise for the judge in an unsuccessful attempt to persuade him to soften the stinging language in his order. Senior U.S. District Court Judge William J. Zloch copied Acosta on his order, noting, "The court is at a total loss as to why the Office of the United States Attorney for t...

…n unsuccessful attempt to persuade him to soften the stinging language in his order. HOUSE OVERSIGHT 021729 Senior U.S. District Court Judge William J. Zloch copied Acosta on his order, noting, "The court is at a total loss as to why the Office of the United States Attorney for t...

…he outer limit that the Government has at least "contemplated" charges. 7! Similarly, in United States v. Oakum, ” the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia considered a claim that CVRA rights did not apply until after a defendant had been convicted. In rejecting t...

…llegations against Agnew as well as precluding "issuing any indictment." The United States, in a response filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by Solicitor General Robert Bork, opposed any immunity from criminal process for a vice president. The solicitor gen...

…ess. That cast, along with a claim by Virginia Roberts against the federal government over the 2007 prosecution deal in district court (which she filed as a "Jane Doe" in 2008), are still pending and are the source of most of the scant information about Clinton that has appeared....

In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001., 2012 WL 257568 (2012) The district court also dismissed many other non-Federal plaintiffs’ intentional tort claims for assault and battery, trespass, and wrongful death and survival on the ground that plaintiffs failed to allege t...

…nion or if this Court is inclined to reach a decision on the TVPA claims independently of Mohamad, it should vacate the district court’s dismissals. The TVPA *138 creates an action in tort and, therefore, should be interpreted in light of the well-established common law (and inte...

…3870, 4318-19, 4529. JA3832-33, 4302-05, 4314-20, 4528-45. JA3870, 4528-45. JA3724-28, 3832-33, 4302-05, 4314-20. The district court dismissed the Burnett ATA claim against Al Rajhi Bank. SPA55-57 (Terrorist Attacks I). The district court also dismissed the remaining ATA claims...