Results for “District Court for the Eastern District of New York”

we would request that the Court direct that the Defendant not be

Jane Doe No. 3 provides the Court with a

“The Supreme Court's definition of obscenity is that it has

the court may appoint counsel for a victim to assist the victim in exercising his or her

1015-18 (3d Cir. 1993) (holding that the court has inherent power to order defendant's retained law firm to remain as standby

representation of indigents upon court order has been a traditional obligation of the lawyer

Court Appointment of Attorneys in Civil Cases: The Constitutionality of

81 Colum. L. Rev. 366 (1981) (discussing the constitutionality of pro bono court appointments); Judy E.

’’ Roberts wrote in the 2015 court affidavit. “The first time was when I was about 16

the Court would surely rebuff such an expansion of Presidential authority. At the same time

and pleaded guilty in state court to felony solicitation of prostitution and

In Williams v. Pennsylvania (2016), the court held that a state judge’s potential bias violated due process because he had played a role, a quarter-century earlier, in prosecuting the death-row inmate whose habeas corpus petition he was hearing. The passage of time and involveme...

Jane Doe No. 3’s attorney’s Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP. CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, non-party Jane Doe No. 3 respectfully requests that this Court grant her Motion to Quash, or alternatively, that the Court enter an order limiting the scope of her document production and deposition...

Family and acquaintances, including a former Fort Worth police lieutenant, submitted letters to the court vouching for McDaniel’s character. There were other issues, however, presented to the judge. While McDaniel was being held in federal lockup awaiting sentencing, he had corr...

Case 9:6ase-doFeeKardsBbis eR aaumentieaaon tied 9 Weeldet oFage2b 26 1 Page 3 of 10 on the part of the movant, . . . undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, [and] futility of amendment.’” Laurie, 256 F.3d at 1274 (quoting Foman v. Davis,...