Results for “Ashton Plaintiffs”

plaintiffs supplemented their already detailed allegations record relevant to those jurisdictional disputes through extrinsic information and evidence filed in support of their oppositions to the Defendants’ motions to dismiss. These materials *12 included

plaintiffs conceded that Terrorist Attacks III was dispositive as to the immunity defenses asserted by the Saudi Red Crescent Society (SRC) and Saudi Joint Relief Committee for Kosovo and Chechnya (SJRC)

plaintiffs in all cases agreed voluntarily to withdrew the appeals as to twenty-two defendants.6 Several additional non-dispositive stipulations of dismissal were filed in individual cases as to other Appellees. As a result

the district court declined to apply hornbook tort principles in concluding that defendants owed no “duty of care” to plaintiffs

an ATA claim may be predicated on the provision of support without plaintiffs having to establish that the defendants sought to advance any particular terrorist attack -- or even terrorist activities generally -- by the entities or persons receiving that support. See

the district court misapplied fundamental legal principles governing the assessment of a complaint and related pleadings upon a motion to dismiss. It also dramatically understated or disregarded the scope

“Congress[] clearly expressed [an] intent to cut off the flow of money to terrorists at every point along the causal chain of violence.” Boim I

“Saudi American Bank knowingly provided material support and resources to al Qaida” by “finance [ing] many of the projects undertaken by Osama bin Laden and al Qaida in the Sudan during the years that the al Qaida leadership structure operated from that country ....” JA843-44

and provid[ing] a mechanism to allow al Qaida supporters to deposit funds directly into those accounts.” JA3844. These actions were alleged to have been done “[i]n cooperation with the charities operating within al Qaida’s infrastructure ....” JA3844. Also

Dallah al Baraka “facilitated jihad operations in the world [by] providing Osama bin Laden with financial infrastructures in Sudan ....” R.1233

and individuals in the midst of al-Qaeda’s network are more likely to be part of al-Qaeda and at least well placed to know the nature of its activities. See Al-Adahi v. Obama

such that a reasonable trier of fact could conclude that it was more likely than not that the support provided by the defendant assisted the terrorists in the commission of the terrorist act.

which provides a cause of action for victims of torture or extrajudicial killings perpetrated by “individual[s]” acting “under actual or apparent authority

the district court should have applied equitable tolling principles. All of plaintiffs’ claims arise from the defendants’ participation in the conspiracy to conduct terrorist attacks against the United States

782 November 5, 2004, when the Court heard oral argument from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in its motion to dismiss the Federal Insurance complaint. I. Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under the FSIA [2-4] Under the FSIA, a foreign state and its instrumentalities are presumed im- mu...