Results for “Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Association”

starting well before they were rich and famous. People often have a hard time changing old habits. I know that no matter how much money I now have

while my wife and I discussed health care policy with Hillary. The President told a joke that wasn’t particularly funny. My family has very high standards of humor

as well as of other Christian denominations. He lights the national Christmas tree and this year also lit Hanukkah candles in the White House.

but he was aware of only two of them. He knew that he could litigate and try to win – as he ended up doing. He also knew that he could try to settle the case

but the President would not have had to dignify a rumor with a response. It was the entirely avoidable decision to have him testify under oath – not once

lecturing and writing about the corrosive influences of perjury on our legal system -- especially when committed by those whose job it is to enforce the law

the place to begin is at or near the top of the perjury hierarchy. If instead we continue deliberately to blind ourselves to pervasive police perjury and other equally dangerous forms of lying under oath

I had received a call from someone close to the White House giving me the phone number where Monica was staying and urging me to call her. I perceived a possible conflict of interest

or were they scapegoats of the cold war whose execution was a grave miscarriage of justice? That both are true is the intriguing argument of [the new book.]

and I wanted very much to talk to him. I thought he was getting terrible advice from his lawyers. I tried to write him a letter. I don’t know if he ever read the letter.

and every move should take into account the anticipated media coverage. This doesn’t mean you should make or refrain from making the right move because of the anticipated coverage

because the law treats famous people differently. Sometimes better. Sometimes worse. Never the same. It has been said that hard cases make bad law. So

a conflict arose between some leaders of the African American and Jewish communities. Most African American leaders were deeply committed to race-specific affirmative action programs that gave advantages to all Black applicants

as well as other applicants who are economically and culturally deprived; none of them would offend the Constitution. But what the school may not do

commenting that the “cynical” may say that “under a program such as Harvard’s one may accomplish covertly what Davis concedes it does openly.” Justice Powell nowhere disputed this. His answer seems to be that even if both programs produce the same result