Results for “Center for Strategic and International Studies”

finding that the pamphlet created “a clear and present danger” of hindering the war effort while our soldiers were fighting for their lives and our liberty.

the uttering of the prohibited words on a Pacifica radio station that broadcast Carlin’s routine led to a Supreme Court decision setting out standards for what could and could not be said during certain hours of the day and night.

individual decision to go to a movie theater and there to satisfy his intellectual and emotional needs in the company exclusively of voluntary people

” but I argued that there was no real difference between possession and exhibition:

from having something thrust on them in an unwilling manner and also to protect youngsters.

and the state were to try to enjoin that

I would submit that the Constitution has a clear answer to that. It must permit the film to be shown in a way to minimize your exposure to it and to permit you both fully to see and to avoid being exposed to the contents of the film.

which the prosecutor had argued was “irrelevant” to this case and which

who I had known when I clerked for Judge Bazelon. Burger and Bazelon were arch enemies

a Harvard Law School professor and one of the nation’s preeminent constitutional lawyers

hundreds of readers came forward and volunteered their assistance. It also generated numerous other stories—presenting our side of the case.

and the people urging criminal prosecution were Harvard students. The people who these students wanted to see prosecuted were other students

” one complained. “We shouldn’t have to be subjected to abuse and degradation right in our own living room.”

Gloria Steinem had written an article in Ms. magazine about Deep Throat and the exploitation of its female lead

but against lawyers who represented them on First Amendment grounds. When I and several friends opened a Kosher deli in Harvard Square