Names that match “PAUL G. CASSELL”
656 documents found
2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *891
document IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017657.txt House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
Page 22 of 78
2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *891
(1) Disclosure. If the defendant serves a Rule 12.1(a)(2) notice [regarding intent to present an alibi defense], an attorney for the
government must disclose in writing to the defendant or '78 the defendant's attorney:
(A) the name, add...
an acknowledgement by Edwards and Cassell that the
document be construed as being House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
an acknowledgement by Edwards and Cassell that the
punish and release accused or convicted offenders."" Tribe & Cassell
document officials prosecute House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
punish and release accused or convicted offenders."" Tribe & Cassell
two of the authors of this Article (Cassell and Edwards) are co-counsel for the
document disclosure House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
two of the authors of this Article (Cassell and Edwards) are co-counsel for the
1999 UTAH L. REv. 479 [hereinafter Cassell
document Critics of the Victims’ Rights Amendment House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
1999 UTAH L. REv. 479 [hereinafter Cassell
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 13 of
document IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014096.txt Mar 24, 2015 House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 13 of
34
Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz
Case No.: CACE 15-000072
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents
Response to Requests for Production 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 2...
Dershowitz that we would then believe, in light of your ruling
document IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011342.txt House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
10
id.
12
13
14
L5
16
ne)
18
life)
20
21
22
23
24
25
39
H3VOGIU1
Dershowitz that we would then believe, in light of your ruling,
should be redacted. But until we have any rulings from your
Honor restricting the case, it's our position that all --
THE COURT: Bu...
along with other attomeys at Farmer Jaffe and Professor Cassell
document In July 2010 House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
along with other attomeys at Farmer Jaffe and Professor Cassell
Edwards and Cassell will ""rue the day"" they ever filed the Joinder
document charge against me"" — i.e. House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
Edwards and Cassell will ""rue the day"" they ever filed the Joinder
44 21 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. 01:30:54 21 course of Professor Cassell's deposition when
document 01:29 House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
44 21 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. 01:30:54 21 course of Professor Cassell's deposition when
and its very important 02:30:56 7 Q. Mr. Cassell
document 022620 7 important subject to me House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
and its very important 02:30:56 7 Q. Mr. Cassell
we are prohibited from answering 003025 19 personal communication between Professor Cassell
document 0028:01 19 Otherwise House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
we are prohibited from answering 003025 19 personal communication between Professor Cassell
you will continue to 02:49:26 15 marked yesterday as Cassell Exhibit Number 2
document 02:48:00 15 notwithstanding that statement House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
you will continue to 02:49:26 15 marked yesterday as Cassell Exhibit Number 2
Mr. Cassell? 03:07:03 22 A. There were no videotapes available to law
document 010427 22 Q. Had you finished your answer House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
Mr. Cassell? 03:07:03 22 A. There were no videotapes available to law
2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *879
document IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017649.txt House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
Page 14 of 78
2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *879
victims’ rights in the [*880] plea process. Because the CVRA guarantees victims a right in the plea process, its dictates will
ultimately govern. But only the Advisory Committee can pretermit such needless litigation about how to interpr...