Page 20 of 42 103 Minn. L. Rev. 844, *884 prosecution of excessive police uses of force. Finally, another institution responds to some of the same underenforcement problems that private prosecution and judicial review could address - redundant prosecution authority in a federal...
Results for “Indiana Supreme Court”
Search across the indexed text of every released document.
Names that match “Indiana Supreme Court”
1,714 documents found
Page 42 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *919 privacy interest in keeping personal facts away from the public eye." 34° Consider, for example, the privacy of therapeutic counseling communications. Federal case law establishes that such communications are protected by a constitutiona...
IN RE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 825 Cite as 349 F.Supp.2d 765 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) available to the world community. Addi- tionally, Plaintiffs submit that these cases have been widely reported in the Arabic media and the complaints have been avail- able on numerous w...
Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records Page 2 of 20 these documents, not only in defamatory statements broadcast worldwide, but also in his pleadings before thi...
Filing # 34801581 E-Filed 11/23/2015 05:53:31 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. / PLAINTIFFS/COUNTERC...
In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001., 2012 WL 257568 (2012) remaining defendants, who allegedly held more junior positions in foreign governments, was unclear. Struggling to interpret the precise meaning of Terrorist Attacks III's personal jurisdiction holding, plaint...
In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001., 2012 WL 257568 (2012) present at the time of death or injury to recover under NIED. Bovsun, 61 N.Y.2d at 233. Here, plaintiffs -- many of them the surviving family members of 9/11 victims -- allege that the defendants’ knowing mat...
IN RE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 811 Cite as 349 F.Supp.2d 765 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253, 78 §.Ct. 1228, 2 L.Ed.2d 1288 (1958)). [52] For purposes of the minimum con- tacts inquiry, a distinction is made be- tween specific and general j...
Page 51 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *932 In addition, an independent basis for victims reviewing presentence reports is the victim's broad right under the CVRA to be "treated with fairness" 4°? and right to restitution, as I argued in my earlier article. 4 Thus, the CVRA shou...
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 96 H3vlgiu2 THE COURT: Well, what do you say about the case that's been cited? MS. SCHULTZ: Well, about Adelson? I would say that it's factually distinguished because here she is two days later reiterating...
Page Page Page Page Page Page Page 311 312 313 314 BL 316 317 AA A AD A A A Court Court Court Court Court Court Court Seal Seal Seal Seal Seal Seal Seal ling ling ling ling ling ling ling Order; Order; Order; Order; Order; Order; Order; KKAMAKKAKAMAMKKAAKAAMAMAKKA Xx x x...
796 argue the Court’s adjudication of Plaintiffs’ claims would interfere with the executive branch’s discretion to designate state sponsors of terror. See 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7)(A) (isting statutes that give Secretary of State authority to designate countries as sponsors of terr...
Page 56 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *939 both approved broadening that rule to give all victims the right to speak. “87 (The Judicial Conference withdrew this proposed rule to allow reconsideration in light of the CVRA.) The CVRA gave victims the right to be "reasonably heard"...
Page 61 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *946 The Advisory Committee's next argument is that to allow victims to be heard on dismissals would violate the CVRA's requirement that nothing in the Act "shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General." 4...
January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2002.” Defendant is seeking personal diary information during the time this non-party was a minor child and a victim of sexual trafficking. There is no reason this non-party should be forced to produce her diary from when she was a child. See Peis...