…tional discovery on that issue. , In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 Burnett v. Al Baraka Inv. & Dev. Corp. Ashton v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army Tremsky v. Qsama Bin Laden Salvo v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army Burnett v. Al Baraka Inv. & Dev. Corp. Federal Insurance v. Al Qaida B...
Results for “Ashton Plaintiffs”
Search across the indexed text of every released document.
Names that match “Ashton Plaintiffs”
273 documents found
…rs of Saudi Arabia, decreed the formation of SHC, also known as the Saudi High Relief Commission, by High Order 17419. (Ashton Compl. J 446; Burnett Compl. J 392; Federal Compl. § 180; see also SHC Mem. in Sup. Mot. to Dismiss at 3.) The same High Order named Defendant Prince Sal...
… 1950 by Salim bin Mahfouz, the father of Defendant Khalid bin Mahfouz, as the first commer- cial bank of Saudi Arabia. Ashton Com- plaint 1563; Burnett Complaint 188. The Ashton Plaintiffs allege that the bin Mah- fouz family controlled NCB until 1999 when the Saudi government b...
…e Salman knowingly failed to take appropriate actions regarding the management and use of funds of the SHC in Bosnia.” (Ashton Compl. J 457; Burnett Compl. § 406.) On December 30, 2000, the Embassy of the State of Palestine in Riyadh sent Prince Salman a letter expressing Yasser...
… issue of jurisdictional fact. Da- ventree, 349 F.Supp.2d 736, at 761, 2004 WL 2997881, at *20. 3. Prince Mohamed The Ashton and Federal Plaintiffs allege that Prince Mohamed is or was the chair- man or chief executive officer of three financial institutions in Saudi Arabia: Da...
… jurisdiction is accordingly granted. 8. Saudi Binladin Group, Tariq Bin- ladin, Omar Binladin, and Bakr Binladin The Ashton and Burnett complaints name the Saudi Binladin Group (““SBG”) as a Defendant. The Burnett complaint also names Tariq Binladin, Omar Binladin, and Bakr Bi...
…ot allege that Jalaidan directed an enterprise and the RICO claim is dismissed. Wa‘el Jalaidan’s motions to dismiss the Ashton, Burnett, and Federal complaints are denied E. IIRO 361 Similarly, for the reasons the Court found that Plaintiffs made a prima facie demonstration that...
…re granted in their entirety. 4. Al Baraka Investment & Develop- ment Corporation and Saleh Ab- dullah Kamel [98] The Ashton and Burnett com- plaints detail nearly identical claims against Al Baraka Investment & Develop- ment Corp. (“Al Baraka”) and Saleh Ab- dullah Kamel. Ash...
… 11, 2001, 392 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 at that address, or elsewhere.” *570 (Burnett Compl. J 262; Ashton Compl. § 334.) The complaints further allege that many of the “SAAR Network” organizations’ offices in Herndon were raided in March 2002 as part of Opera...
… personal jurisdiction over SBG they are entitled the opportunity to develop these claims. SBG’s motions to dismiss the Ashton and Burnett complaints for failure to state a claim are therefore denied without prejudice. 7. SAAR Network [101] The Federal Plaintiffs’ allega- tions...
822 the Global Diamond Resource’s Chairman by an executive of SBG. Ashton Complaint 1459; Burnett Complaint { 328. Plaintiffs claim that SBG had an address in Rockville, Maryland until very recently. Ashton Complaint 1545; Burnett Com- plaint 1318. SBG claims the Rockville addr...
Filing # 37357304 E-Filed 02/03/2016 12:44:44 PM BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, vs. Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. ___________________________________________/ IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CI...
836 mainly banks in Arab and Islamic coun- tries. Ashton Complaint 1583; Burnett Complaint 147. It also has banks in Chi- cago, Illinois and Houston, Texas. Bur- nett Complaint 147. Al Baraka allegedly provided financial infrastructures in Sudan to Osama bin Laden through Defend...
In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001., 2012 WL 257568 (2012) The district court also dismissed many other non-Federal plaintiffs’ intentional tort claims for assault and battery, trespass, and wrongful death and survival on the ground that plaintiffs failed to allege t...
In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001., 2012 WL 257568 (2012) Plaintiffs assert claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2331 ef seg., and under the Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) statute, *5 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962 ef seg., which conferred j...