…o believed in the prosecution that he "would try the case myself." • Indeed, Mr. Sloman acknowledges that Mr. Oosterbaan had previously opined on this matter, stating: This particular attack on this statute [18 U.S.C. § 2242(b)] had been pr...
Oosterbaan
Named in 3 passages across 2 documents.
Mentions of Oosterbaan in the public Epstein records, with citations.
Being named in these documents is not an accusation or evidence of wrongdoing. This page reflects only what the public records literally contain, with citations to the original sources.
Where Oosterbaan appears
3 total
…iew, concluded in May 2008, was neither independent nor de nova. o CEOS' review was not "independent:" • Drew Oosterbaan, who conducted the review on behalf of CEOS, had already reviewed the prosecution memo on this matter eight months earl...
…an referred to (§ 2422(b)) lies at the heart of the Epstein investigation. Thus, according to Mr. Sloman, Mr. Oosterbaan was tasked with reviewing his own prior decision regarding applying the key statute under which the SDFL proposed prose...
Response to Letter by FAUSA Sloman Dated May 19, 2008
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012172.txt
p.1
View source release ↗
Also named alongside
Want context across all of these passages at once?
Ask the documents about Oosterbaan