…n and Plaintiffs have not made a prima facie showing that Mr. Jalaidan is subject to personal jurisdiction in New York or any other state. The Court turns to Mr. Jalaidan’s contacts with the United States. In addition to being designated as...
Plaintiffs Do Not Claim To Have Served Mr. Jalaidan In The United States Under The Ata’s Nationwide Service Provision. Accordingly
Plaintiffs do not claim to have served Mr. Jalaidan in the United States under the ATA’s nationwide service provision. Accordingly
p.1
View source release ↗