Every indexed document

I have never seen a more evasive effort to 00:43:15 12 reported -- a Florida business newspaper that

let me just -- 00:4256 2 saying anything about his communications or why

and include information up until today? 0042:51 22 testimony.

to assert that Professor Dershowitz intentionally 00:42:35 15 acknowledging that -- I'm sorry. I think he's

based on the information you have available to 0042:34 14 MS. McCAWLEY: I think he's just

a portion of the record was read 00:42:25 7 and I'm not going into any ....-

because there was immediately an objection

and I will not repeat what was said in the

29 24 limited to the time period prior to December

I don't 00:39:20 21 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. The question that

and so it struck me as odd that there 00:39:13 19 merely incomplete

which 063605 17 gave a long answer in which you described reasons you

I'm 00:3854 13 was one of the topics that I was hoping could have been

12 5 the ability to produce witnesses and documents and other 00:38

00:38:25 3 Q. Is it your testimony under oath that you have

it seemed to me that it was 00:3825 2 agencies.

Mr. Dershowitz was not 063603 19 strike the nonresponsive portion of the answer.

39 18 be surprising that during the period of time where 00:38:02 18 MR. SIMPSON: Well

so there were now inconsistencies on these 00:37:56 16 I was thinking about.

one of Mr. Epstein's 0637:55 15 So that was -- those were the kinds of things