Documents in the Epstein records

who was then working off-Broadway in a stage play

document After reading Ordeal I called Reems and asked him whether his recollections of the filming of Deep Throat corroborated her claim that she had been forced into performing. Harry House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

who was then working off-Broadway in a stage play

Gloria Steinem had written an article in Ms. magazine about Deep Throat and the exploitation of its

document Several weeks prior to the scheduled showing House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

Gloria Steinem had written an article in Ms. magazine about Deep Throat and the exploitation of its female lead

an escape from the tensions of the tests. But feminists were beginning to take pornographic movies

document The uproar had caught the film society by surprise. The showing of Deep Throat had become a pre exam tradition at many colleges. My own nephew sponsored a showing at MIT. It was seen as a lark House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

an escape from the tensions of the tests. But feminists were beginning to take pornographic movies

” one complained. “We shouldn’t have to be subjected to abuse and degradation right in our own livin

document Some women students who lived in Quincy House protested. “This is our home House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

” one complained. “We shouldn’t have to be subjected to abuse and degradation right in our own living room.”

and the people urging criminal prosecution were Harvard students. The people who these students want

document My second encounter with Deep Throat presented a more daunting challenge to my theory. It took place on my home turf of Harvard House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

and the people urging criminal prosecution were Harvard students. The people who these students wanted to see prosecuted were other students

the publicity had its intended effect on the public

document But people contributed and Reems and I persisted in making our case in the court of public opinion. In time House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

the publicity had its intended effect on the public

[which] had been shown a videotape of Deep Throat

document Dershowitz acted as a sort of kibitzer for Harry. He noted that the crew of the Glomar Explorer House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

[which] had been shown a videotape of Deep Throat

looking like a tweedy Marx Brother with his wild nimbus of ash-blond hair

document Harry stood with a portrait of Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter beaming down on him. Besides him sat Alan Dershowitz House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

looking like a tweedy Marx Brother with his wild nimbus of ash-blond hair

hundreds of readers came forward and volunteered their assistance. It also generated numerous other

document Following the publication of the Hentoff article had House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

hundreds of readers came forward and volunteered their assistance. It also generated numerous other stories—presenting our side of the case.

the government could make dangerous use of that precedent in political cases involving

document Hentoff explained that the implications of the Reems prosecution go well beyond obscenity. If a conspiracy charge like this one was to be upheld on appeal House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

the government could make dangerous use of that precedent in political cases involving

obscenity indictments throughout the country will pyramid

document Should the verdict against Harry Reems be sustained House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

obscenity indictments throughout the country will pyramid.

a Harvard Law School professor and one of the nation’s preeminent constitutional lawyers

document Alan Dershowitz House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

a Harvard Law School professor and one of the nation’s preeminent constitutional lawyers

“Any person who participates in any way in the creation

document As Mr. Dershowitz interprets the Deep Throat case House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

“Any person who participates in any way in the creation

Mr. Reems has some of the country’s most impressive legal talent working on his appeal

document With Mr. Dershowitz as the lead lawyer and the American Civil Liberties Union and other prominent groups and individual prepared to help House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

Mr. Reems has some of the country’s most impressive legal talent working on his appeal.

” but is now being understood “as a very serious issue”

document We succeeded in getting The New York Times to cover the case. Its initial story told how the Reems prosecution was first seen “as a joke House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

” but is now being understood “as a very serious issue”:

bang on the law. If you have the facts on your side

document There’s an old saying that goes this way: “If you have the law on your side House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

bang on the law. If you have the facts on your side

But As I Promised Judge Aldrich

document But as I promised Judge Aldrich House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

I continued to press my principle in the court of public opinion and in a series of other obscenity cases over the next several decades. Ultimately my view would prevail

We Categorically Disapprove The Theory…That Obscene

document We categorically disapprove the theory…that obscene House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

pornographic films acquire constitutional immunity from state regulation simply because they are exhibited for consenting adults only…The States have a long-recognized legitimate interest in the quality of life and the total community envir...

A Few Months Later The Supreme Court Rendered A 5 To 3 Decision In The I Am Curious Yellow Case That Did Not Reach The Broad Issue Decided By The District Court (Nor Did It Mention Bear Baiting); Instead

document A few months later the Supreme Court rendered a 5 to 3 decision in the I Am Curious Yellow case that did not reach the broad issue decided by the district court (nor did it mention bear-baiting); instead House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

it decided the case on a narrow procedural ground. We eventually settled the case to the advantage of the defendants. The film was shown throughout the country and no one went to prison. Judge Aldrich’s opinion

but in order to have a film of bear-baiting

document [H]ow about moving the bear-baiting into a theater and charging $5 admission for it? I don’t want to overwork you on the bear-baiting House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

but in order to have a film of bear-baiting