documentNot everyone understands this distinction. My own mother insisted that I was “helping” Nazis and terrorists when I supported their right to speakHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
even while condemning what they were saying. Far better educated people than my mother also claimed not to understand. In a debate in Canada on laws criminalizing Holocaust denial
documentThe orchestra board responded that Redgrave has earned more money since the cancellation than before itHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
documentRedgrave herself has used her art “to do the work” of terrorists. In 1977House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
she made a film calling for the destruction of the Jewish state by armed struggle. She has personally received training in terrorism at camps from which terrorist raids were staged. She advocated the assassination of Nobel Peace Prize winne...
documentAD: And I have faith in the American people that they will reject your ideas in the marketplace of ideas and you should not have the benefit of censorship so that you can stand up and proclaim your views. You knowHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
documentAD: The only publicity you will get from me is the most negative kind of publicity because I sayHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
your ideas belong in a nutshell because they are nutty ideas
documentAD: My purposes are the purposes of the First Amendment. Mr. HaleHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
you will rue the day that you ever thought that I would give you publicity because I will not stop condemning your organization and you know that the only condition that I will accept your case is because you have given me the freedom to ar...
documentMH: Well the fact of the matter if having a “Dershowitz” in this equation has brought our church an incredible amount of publicity and as a minister in my churchHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
it is my obligation to bring about as much publicity as possible.
documentThe civil liberties-free speech rationale does not work for Chomsky: civil libertarians who defend the free speech of neo-Nazis do not get into bed with them by legitimating their false “findings” as having been based on “extensive historical researchHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
” and by defending them—on the merits—against well-documented charges of anti-Semitism. Moreover
documentFollowing this exchangeHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
I challenged Chomsky to a public debate on the issue of whether it is anti-Semitic or anti-Jewish to deny the Holocaust. This was his answer: “It is so obvious that there is no point in debating it because nobody believes there in an anti-S...
document“While some may regard Chomsky as an eminent linguistHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
he does not understand the most obvious meaning of words in context. To fail to see any “hint of anti-Semitic implications” in Faurisson’s collective condemnation of the Jewish people as liars
document“I see no anti-Semitic implications in denial of the existence of gas chambersHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
or even denial of the Holocaust. Nor would there be anti-Semitic implications
documentChomsky wrote an essay that he allowed to be used as a foreword to Faurisson’s next bookHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
about his career as a Holocaust denier! In this book
documentSeveral years ago I became embroiled in a heated controversy with Professor Noam Chomsky over the issue of Holocaust denial and the proper role of a civil libertarian in defending the right of Holocaust deniersHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
documentThe same would be true if Jewish students were to try to prevent an anti-Israel speaker from presenting the case against Israel. No studentHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
no matter how strongly they feel that their view is the only correct one
documentThe opposite is true. If these students had been let off with a slap on the wrist from the UniversityHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
that would encourage other students around the nation and the world to continue with the efforts to prevent pro-Israel speakers from delivering their speeches. Indeed
