detailing how science was used to challenge the prosecution’s case. 65 I will not repeat what I wrote in those books
Every indexed document
Browse the released records by type and release. Open any document to read its text and jump to the official source.
69,179 documents
since I love developing evidence and arguing to juries
I use science not only as a shield to protect my client
as has more sophisticated forensic testing and better crime laboratories
or murder trials and of unsolved homicides. The Bible recounts the murder of Abel by Cain. That crime was solved by God questioning Cain: “Where is your brother Abel?” Cain’s evasive answer—“Am I my brother’s keeper?”—convinced God
which had affirmed the original death sentence. This time the court unanimously reversed the trial judge
the trial court reimposed death sentences
since the Arizona courts had not found that the condemned brothers had shown a “reckless disregard for human life.” 60 The majority therefore
a mental state that may be taken into account in making a capital sentencing judgment when that conduct causes its natural
one intends certain consequences when he desires that his acts cause those consequences or knows that those consequences are substantially certain to result from his acts.""... As petitioners point out
we would win. The justices seemed to acknowledge that if there was no evidence that Ricky and Raymond had the “specific intent” to kill the Lyons’ family “that’s the end of the case.” I was confident that when the justices reviewed the enti...
I decided to point the Court to the record evidence that the brothers were not at the scene of the crime and did not foresee that their father and Randy would kill the Lyons’ family:
” and that the brothers “presence at the scene” is “essential
the two boys instead of following along as they did
but insisting that they could not be executed for the unanticipated murders:
so I threw a hypothetical back to him—law professor to law professor:
under an agreement that no shooting would take place.
but this time the stakes were much higher. I answered the Justice’s question:
but the idea of a gun being throw by one robber to another had never occurred to me. I had to think quickly. In the classroom
it was clear from the record that they specifically intended not to kill and that Gary and Randy had to trick the brothers into going for water before opening fire. I also pointed to a finding by the Arizona Supreme Court that the murder of...