Document index

Every indexed document

Browse the released records by type and release. Open any document to read its text and jump to the official source.

69,179 documents

85 Prior To The Lewinsky Matter Becoming Public
document 85 Prior to the Lewinsky matter becoming public House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

there were widespread reports that the President limited his extra-marital sex to oral gratification since he believed that it did not constitute Biblical adultery and it gave him verbal deniability regarding sexual relations. This history....

as he made clear in his conversation with me. Also included in that category
document A second category of celebrities that I have represented are those who were not well known to the public but whose alleged crimes made them famous. Claus Von Bulow is a prime example of this phenomenon House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

as he made clear in his conversation with me. Also included in that category

who was among the most famous football players in the country before he was accused of murdering his
document The first type consists of individuals who were already very famous before they got into trouble or before they needed my legal advice. Among my clients who fit this category are OJ Simpson House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

who was among the most famous football players in the country before he was accused of murdering his wife and her friend; Mike Tyson

70 There Is A Third Category That Combines Mercy Killings With Mercy Suicides. In Another One Of My Cases
document 70 There is a third category that combines mercy killings with mercy suicides. In another one of my cases House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

a mother engaged in the combined act of trying to kill her autistic and sexually abused son and trying to kill herself. She succeeded in the former and failed in the latter. She reasonably believed that the child’s biological father was rep...

“Assuming That The Statement Was Relevant To Rebut The Defense Theories
document “Assuming that the statement was relevant to rebut the defense theories House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

we conclude that the district court abused its discretion under Shults in admitting the statement without an appropriate limiting instruction. The prejudicial impact was great:  the statement strongly implied Murphy killed Binion. Moreover

66 Sometimes The Prosecutor Seeks The Death Penalty Simply To Gain A Tactical Advantage At The Guilt Or Innocence Phase Of The Trial. This Advantage Derives From The Fact That In Death Penalty Cases
document 66 Sometimes the prosecutor seeks the death penalty simply to gain a tactical advantage at the guilt or innocence phase of the trial. This advantage derives from the fact that in death penalty cases House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

the prosecutor is entitled to a “death qualified” jury consisting of 12 people who have no conscientious objection to capital punishment and would be willing to sentence someone to death. Such jurors

the Arizona Supreme Court attempted to reformulate ""intent to kill"" as a species of foreseeability
document 59 The court then elaborated on its reasoning: The Arizona Supreme Court did not attempt to argue that the facts of this case supported an inference of ""intent"" in the traditional sense. Instead House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

the Arizona Supreme Court attempted to reformulate ""intent to kill"" as a species of foreseeability. The Arizona Supreme Court wrote:

NBC and Leon Uris. The film “Schindler’s List
document Prof. Bartov characterized his work as an irrational Jewish “conspiracy theory.” The conspirators include Steven Spielberg House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

NBC and Leon Uris. The film “Schindler’s List

but because they are violating the most basic canons of historical scholarship. It is typical of Fau
document That is not “extensive historical research.” It is not research at all. It is the fraudulent manufacturing of false antihistory. It is the kind of deception for which professors are rightly fired: not because their views are controversial House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

but because they are violating the most basic canons of historical scholarship. It is typical of Faurisson in particular