documentMH: Well the fact of the matter if having a “Dershowitz” in this equation has brought our church an incredible amount of publicity and as a minister in my churchHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
it is my obligation to bring about as much publicity as possible.
documentThe civil liberties-free speech rationale does not work for Chomsky: civil libertarians who defend the free speech of neo-Nazis do not get into bed with them by legitimating their false “findings” as having been based on “extensive historical researchHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
” and by defending them—on the merits—against well-documented charges of anti-Semitism. Moreover
documentFollowing this exchangeHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
I challenged Chomsky to a public debate on the issue of whether it is anti-Semitic or anti-Jewish to deny the Holocaust. This was his answer: “It is so obvious that there is no point in debating it because nobody believes there in an anti-S...
document“While some may regard Chomsky as an eminent linguistHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
he does not understand the most obvious meaning of words in context. To fail to see any “hint of anti-Semitic implications” in Faurisson’s collective condemnation of the Jewish people as liars
document“I see no anti-Semitic implications in denial of the existence of gas chambersHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
or even denial of the Holocaust. Nor would there be anti-Semitic implications
documentChomsky wrote an essay that he allowed to be used as a foreword to Faurisson’s next bookHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
about his career as a Holocaust denier! In this book
documentSeveral years ago I became embroiled in a heated controversy with Professor Noam Chomsky over the issue of Holocaust denial and the proper role of a civil libertarian in defending the right of Holocaust deniersHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
documentThe same would be true if Jewish students were to try to prevent an anti-Israel speaker from presenting the case against Israel. No studentHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
no matter how strongly they feel that their view is the only correct one
documentThe opposite is true. If these students had been let off with a slap on the wrist from the UniversityHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
that would encourage other students around the nation and the world to continue with the efforts to prevent pro-Israel speakers from delivering their speeches. Indeed
documentYet signatories of the letter -- which never once criticizes the censoring Muslim Union students while condemning those who wanted to hear the speaker -- include ""Chuck AndersonHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
documentThe students themselves have been more honest about their intentions than the ACLU leaders. . For instanceHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
one student leader refused to acknowledge that Mr. Oren had First Amendment rights of his own by interrupting him and shouting
documentThe students were disciplined by the university for their actionsHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
though the nature and degree of the discipline has been kept confidential. Campus sources have characterized it as a ""slap on the wrist."" Since the students had to be arrested to prevent the speech from being drowned out
