documentThe disclosure of this mass murder shocked the publicHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
which had followed the news of the manhunt with a mixture of fear and admiration for the daring prison escape. Now revulsion replaced admiration. The crimes were characterized by the media as a “mad-dog murder spree
documentDonnyHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
Ricky and Ray retrieved the water jug from the Lyones’ Mazda and were on their way back when they heard the shotguns fire. They could see flashes of fire through the darkness. They stood transfixed. It seemed to last forever. Then it was qu...
documentGary’s prediction proved to be correct about the escape. Raymond went to meet his father in the picnic area. His brothers Ricky and Donny went into the waiting room with their picnic basket. A friend of Gary’sHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
Randy Greenawalt—also a convicted murderer—was in an adjoining control room. When the other visitors had left
documentTo the three boysHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
their father wasn’t a killer. A guard had been accidentally shot in a scuffle. It was not in cold blood. Their father was incapable of that. Gary told them that his criminal conduct had been a result of secret training he had received in th...
documentBefore he could escapeHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
Gary had to get himself removed from the “escape risk” list and maximum security—to establish a sense of trust in him by the prison officials. When some young prisoners acted up
documentThe brothers had never had a “home father.” They referred to Gary as their “prison fatherHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
” since he had spent most of his adult life behind bars
documentAs part of the overall challenge to the death penaltyHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
abolitionists were focusing on the significant number of death row inmates who had neither killed nor intended to kill. Most of these non-triggermen had been convicted of murder on the basis of two legal fictions. The first was the law of c...
documentBeyond the tragic facts of the case was the important legal issue they presentedHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
since neither Ricky nor his brother Raymond Tison actually killed anyone. Nor did they intend anyone to die when they helped their father Gary and his cellmate Randy Greenawalt escape from prison. But at least four innocent people—including...
documentThe story of the Tison case was the stuff of films and television dramas. It involved two families. The family of the killer consisted of the fatherHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
mother and three sons. The family of the victims consisted of a father
documentoriginally devised; there were four new Nixon appointeesHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
and it was clear that at least some of them believed the death penalty to be constitutional. The umpires — if not the rules — had been changed after the strategy of the game had been worked out and irretrievably put into action. Now there w...
documentThen in 1971 the Court took its first turn toward the noose: In Mc-Gautha v. CaliforniaHouse Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)1 pp.
it held that a condemned person’s constitutional rights were not violated “by permitting the jury to impose the death penalty without any governing standards” or by permitting the imposition of the death penalty in “the same proceeding and....