rather than merely as another prisoner of conscience
Every indexed document
Browse the released records by type and release. Open any document to read its text and jump to the official source.
66,700 documents
the Soviet prosecutors dropped the espionage charge and took the death penalty off the table. But they were still determined to see Sharansky die in prison. The Soviets called it “special regime” imprisonment
as to whether or not Mr. Sharanksy has ever had any known relationship in a subversive way
since that was the one that carried the death sentence. Because Sharanksy was accused of spying for the United States
along with Canadian law professor Irwin Cotler
not only of his fellow Soviet Jews but of all victims of Soviet oppression. He worked closely with Andrei Saklarov
who was having a disagreement with another acquaintance
believing that it was still alive. The case presented a series of perplexing scientific and logical riddles: When is a person who has been mortally wounded actually dead? Can you kill a man who is already dead? If not
the lawyers persuaded the authorities not to indict anyone for the tragic accident.
placed in the circumstances in which this one had been placed
based on the television series by that name. There were three segments to the film
the son of a Thai mother and an American soldier
and even compelling evidence of innocence does not guarantee a new trial. In fact
most Americans who have read the book or seen the TV movie of Fatal Vision already ""know"" that Jeffrey MacDonald is guilty. They know it because the Jeffrey MacDonald portrayed in those one-sided presentations was guilty. On TV
a fragment of human skin was found under one of Colette MacDonald's fingernails. Yet
except for a cryptic statement that ""if there were fibers useful to the defense
whose responsibility it was to see that the defense received any evidence in the government's file
which he has protested since the beginning of his case. Over many years
as well as unidentified hairs under the fingernails of the victims. This new and suppressed evidence corroborates Stoeckley’s original account that she remembers being in the house and participating in the murders. Had the trial judge known...
her admissions were not trustworthy. Had he been aware of this corroborating evidence