by demonstrating their misuse of the serious moral crime of real sexual harassment. I have represented women who have experienced real sexual harassment—including a graduate student who was explicitly told by her faculty advisor that the qu...
Every indexed document
Browse the released records by type and release. Open any document to read its text and jump to the official source.
66,700 documents
I refused to be bullied into abandoning a teaching style that I believe is best designed to stimulate thinking. It takes no courage for me to exercise my academic freedom
I teach the law of rape as an example of a cutting-edge subject that poses a sharp conflict between the rights of defendants and their accusers. As usual
but it may well have fallen into the category of gray area. He believed that she wanted to sleep with him. She may have been ambivalent or sending mixed signals (though I doubt it). It was a close case and Tyson was entitled to have his def...
who should understand that our adversary system of justice requires that all convicted defendants be accorded a zealous appeal.
you attach the Jewish community to your action…I now find it hard to understand how you can mount a passionate defense for a convicted rapist.
life begins at the moment of conception and is as sacred then as it is at the moment before birth. To an absolute pro-choicer
like abortion. Extremists on both sides of such issue tend to see things in black and white terms.
I have never encountered a more thoroughly corrupt legal system than I did in 1992 in Indiana and a less fair trial and appeal than those accorded Mike Tyson. If hard cases make bad law
he would have quickly been acquitted. But this was Indiana. They had a trophy in Tyson. And they had a trial judge determined to prevent a new trial that would have embarrassed her and freed Tyson. The conviction was eventually affirmed on....
but Tyson’s attorneys might have successfully pinpointed the crucial issues that will free him.”
and that the call might have been part of the scheme.
or “reasonable belief” concerning whether Tyson believed Washington wanted to have sex with him.
omissions and elementary errors by the fighter’s ex-defense team
famed appellate lawyer Alan Dershowitz vigorously attacked: Tyson’s accuser
this should have been the easiest appeal I ever argued. The law
the jury eventually believed her because there was no compelling reason to disbelieve the testimony of a young
muscular Tyson done that to the 105-pound
the available physical evidence completely undercuts her story. She was wearing a sequin-studded outfit
this time for having consensual sex with Tyson