Every indexed document

thus disproving the causation claim made by some radical feminists: that pornography causes rape.

” since it was made public by him and his family.

a television ad by the organization J Street showed a video of my lips moving and a voice—not mine—saying words that I didn’t say.

although one with possible legal defenses of necessity (choice of evils) and justification (killing to protect her son). That case is pending as I write these words.

a mother engaged in the combined act of trying to kill her autistic and sexually abused son and trying to kill herself. She succeeded in the former and failed in the latter. She reasonably believed that the child’s biological father was rep...

we conclude that the district court abused its discretion under Shults in admitting the statement without an appropriate limiting instruction. The prejudicial impact was great:  the statement strongly implied Murphy killed Binion. Moreover

since no one could know which theory formed the basis for the conviction

the prosecutor is entitled to a “death qualified” jury consisting of 12 people who have no conscientious objection to capital punishment and would be willing to sentence someone to death. Such jurors

Holmes was echoing the views of the 15th Century Jewish sage Isaac Abravanal who observed that “experience is more forceful than logic.”

the Arizona Supreme Court attempted to reformulate ""intent to kill"" as a species of foreseeability. The Arizona Supreme Court wrote:

they made him remove that claim. He has accused virtually every pro-Israel writer

NBC and Leon Uris. The film “Schindler’s List

he has never visited Israel and cannot read or speak German — precluding the possibility of original scholarship.

but because they are violating the most basic canons of historical scholarship. It is typical of Faurisson in particular

checking the Auschwitz record for October 18

that would not be a good enough reason for banning it

consultant or commentator—in the defense of several magazines and books. See e.g. Dershowitz

because it may be true that certain kinds of violent pornography (as well as violent non-pornography) may be contributing factors in certain people’s decision or propensity to rape

truth was not a defense to defamation because a “truthful defamation was deemed more harmful than a false one.” See Alan Dershowitz

and the derivative example is the verbal shout. By cleverly substituting the derivative shout for the core alarm