Every indexed document

but they try to write and say in public exactly what they would in private.

“I am tactful but keep to my original point of view. I don’t

he would indeed orally introduce the official as the “ambassador.” Or

they do not take on projects concerning Taiwan or

they are very careful about discussing China’s restive

there is a tacit understanding that you will not be super critical of

not confrontationally.” One analyst said

but I am cautious in interviews: I will say the same message

but I write in a way that is less shrill.”

even though several pages had been mistranslated

finally settling on five with the agreement

one scholar halted the Chinese publication process. Another scholar battled

most have not. A growing number do not try

it is published openly; if it is critical

and her institute now has a blanket ban on interviews with the Chinese

which they planned to publish without her approval. She successfully

an analyst reported that Xinhua conducted an in-person

with the exception of those that occur in

such as party congresses. Another indicates

they stop speaking to that journalist. One notes that he refuses to