Every indexed document

when asked at his deposition whether he had any evidence of Edwards's

the evidence of Epstein's crimes is now clear

and there is not (and could never be) any contrary evidence.

these allegations all fail for one straightforward reason: Edwards was

689 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1982); see also Holl

then entry of judgment is proper as a matter of law. See Davis v. Hathaway

141 So.2d 626 (Fla. 3d Dist Ct. App. 1962)

it is incumbent on the nonmoving party to submit evidence to rebut the motion for

depositions and factual showings reveal that there is no genuine

each and every one of Edwards's litigation decisions was

Epstein cannot seek damages from Edwards while

he is barred from prosecuting this case against Edwards. Under the

the settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed to pay while

the cases did not settle for the ""minimal value""

in discovery Epstein has asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege rather than

Epstein has filed such allegations against Edwards despite the

and use of ""ridiculously inflammatory"" language in

his attempts to obtain discovery from high-profile

and Edwards's refusal to force his clients to accept modest settlement

these child sexual assault cases had ""minimal value""