Every indexed document

bin Laden determined that the network that supported the mujahedeen in Afghanistan should not be abandoned

bin Laden founded the Maktab al Khidmat (“Office of Services”) to facilitate the provision of financial and logistic support to the mujahedeen.9 Throughout the Afghan jihad

almost worldwide organization. This organization included a financial support network that came to be known as the “Golden Chain

al-Qaeda has its origins in the jihad against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan

plaintiffs in all cases agreed voluntarily to withdrew the appeals as to twenty-two defendants.6 Several additional non-dispositive stipulations of dismissal were filed in individual cases as to other Appellees. As a result

plaintiffs moved this Court to summarily vacate the dismissals in favor of defendants’ SRC

and noted that the Circuit had employed its mini-en banc procedure

this Court issued its decision in Doe v. Bin Laden

plaintiffs conceded that Terrorist Attacks III was dispositive as to the immunity defenses asserted by the Saudi Red Crescent Society (SRC) and Saudi Joint Relief Committee for Kosovo and Chechnya (SJRC)

approximately 90 initial Rule 12 motions remained pending before the district court. Following Terrorist Attacks III

the United States filed an amicus brief on May 29

plaintiffs supplemented their already detailed allegations record relevant to those jurisdictional disputes through extrinsic information and evidence filed in support of their oppositions to the Defendants’ motions to dismiss. These materi...

approximately 100 defendants entered appearances in the cases comprising the September 11th MDL and

and numerous RICO Statements and/or More Definite Statements as to individual defendants

and in responding to the various motions to dismiss

plaintiffs seek to hold accountable the states

based on a decision of this Court construing 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(5)

2001 attacks in Virginia and Pennsylvania are subject to New York’s one-year statute of limitations.

accepted as true and with all reasonable inferences drawn from them in plaintiffs’ favor

for purposes of claims asserting violations of “the law of nations” under the Alien Tort Statute