Documents in the Epstein records · document

the United States filed an amicus brief on May 29

document Plaintiffs thereafter sought review by the U.S. Supreme Court of each of these three principal holdings. In response to a request from the Supreme Court House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

the United States filed an amicus brief on May 29

In Response To Defendants’ Motions Seeking Dismissal For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction And/Or Subject Matter Jurisdiction And Under The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (Fsia)

document In response to defendants’ motions seeking dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction and/or subject matter jurisdiction and under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

plaintiffs supplemented their already detailed allegations record relevant to those jurisdictional disputes through extrinsic information and evidence filed in support of their oppositions to the Defendants’ motions to dismiss. These materi...

approximately 100 defendants entered appearances in the cases comprising the September 11th MDL and

document Between 2002 and 2005 House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

approximately 100 defendants entered appearances in the cases comprising the September 11th MDL and

and numerous RICO Statements and/or More Definite Statements as to individual defendants

document Plaintiffs in virtually all cases later filed one or more amended complaints House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

and numerous RICO Statements and/or More Definite Statements as to individual defendants

and in responding to the various motions to dismiss

document In presenting their substantive claims and theories of jurisdiction against the defendants House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

and in responding to the various motions to dismiss

plaintiffs seek to hold accountable the states

document Through their suits House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

plaintiffs seek to hold accountable the states

based on a decision of this Court construing 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(5)

document 7. Whether the dismissals of three defendants House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

based on a decision of this Court construing 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(5)

2001 attacks in Virginia and Pennsylvania are subject to New York’s one-year statute of limitations

document 5. Whether plaintiffs’ intentional tort claims related to the September 11 House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

2001 attacks in Virginia and Pennsylvania are subject to New York’s one-year statute of limitations.

accepted as true and with all reasonable inferences drawn from them in plaintiffs’ favor

document 4. Whether plaintiffs’ allegations House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

accepted as true and with all reasonable inferences drawn from them in plaintiffs’ favor

for purposes of claims asserting violations of “the law of nations” under the Alien Tort Statute

document 2. Whether House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

for purposes of claims asserting violations of “the law of nations” under the Alien Tort Statute

accepted as true and with all reasonable inferences drawn from them in plaintiffs’ favor

document 1. Whether plaintiffs’ allegations House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

accepted as true and with all reasonable inferences drawn from them in plaintiffs’ favor

2005 (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11

document This Court has appellate jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The district court dismissed defendants in this case in six orders dated January 18 House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

2005 (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11

failed to credit the allegations in the pleadings

document The district court also ignored the wealth of details provided by plaintiffs in their supplemental filings House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

failed to credit the allegations in the pleadings

AXA Corporate Solutions Insurance Company

document Appellants AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

AXA Corporate Solutions Insurance Company

ACE Capital V Ltd for itself and as representative of all subscribing underwriters for ACE Global Ma

document Appellants ACE American Insurance Company House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

ACE Capital V Ltd for itself and as representative of all subscribing underwriters for ACE Global Markets Syndicate 2488

Ltd. is a member of Lloyds’ Syndicate 33

document Appellant Hiscox Dedicated Corporation Member House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

Ltd. is a member of Lloyds’ Syndicate 33.

S.A. de C.V. has no parent corporation; BGC Partners

document Appellant Euro Brokers Mexico House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

S.A. de C.V. has no parent corporation; BGC Partners

Inc. has no parent corporation; BGC Partners

document Appellant Tradesoft Technologies House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

Inc. has no parent corporation; BGC Partners

Inc. (successor to Maxcor Financial Asset Management

document BGC Financial Asset Management House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

Inc. (successor to Maxcor Financial Asset Management

11-3407 (Estate of John P. O’Neill v. Republic of Iraq)

document 11-3294 House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pp.

11-3407 (Estate of John P. O’Neill v. Republic of Iraq):