Every indexed document

on the 5th we're going to do Epstein's motion

if I could indulge the Court while I have your

with respect to any other minor victim. Our

we have agreed that our client can be cross

are these witnesses that the plaintiff had some

they have an interest in this woman who is accusing

and Booty recognizes that. There has to be

we'll hear that this is somehow a hearsay issue

they could both be exact opposite questions. The

the court wouldn't impose an adverse inference

which I didn't realize until I was reading this last

in securing their testimony or requiring

we certainly weren't going to stand in the way of

and they can't because they're protecting their own

we're going to have to do something else

it was basically a nonverbal ""that's not

privilege against self-incrimination because it's

there is no relationship between these folks. At best

not some relationship that happened or didn't

and that is Rule 801(d)(2)(E) of the Federal