civil war, a Sunni fundamentalist takeover, or a new base for al
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releasePeople & organizations named in this document
Being named here is not an accusation of wrongdoing.
Document text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
17
civil war, a Sunni fundamentalist takeover, or a new base for al
Qaeda.
Of course, there would also be an upside to Assad's demise. A brutal
regime would have fallen; Iran would be denied an Arab patron and a
critical window into Lebanon and the Arab-Israeli arena; Hamas
would likely drift further into the orbit of Egypt and Saudi Arabia;
and Hezbollah -- though hardly defanged in Lebanon -- would lose a
critical patron. At this point, however, the administration clearly
judges that the risks of U.S. action outweigh the potential benefits.
Bad options, bad outcomes. So, for now, we watch and wait to see
where the arc on the Assads is headed -- north or south. But if the
Assads do survive, it wouldn't surprise me in the least if Washington
at some point resumes a business-as-usual posture with the only
surviving repressive Arab dictator that's too big to fail.
Aaron David Miller is a public policy scholar at the Woodrow
Wilson International Center for Scholars. His book, Can America
Have Another Great President?, will be published in 2012.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030076
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents