Re: Follow up
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releasePeople & organizations named in this document
Being named here is not an accusation of wrongdoing.
Document text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]
Sent: 2/27/2016 4:36:43 PM
To: Kathy Ruemm ler
Subject: Re: Follow up
Importance: — High
good, , however in writing would be best.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Kathy Ruemmler TE > wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kathy Ruemmlcr {a —
Date: February 27, 2016 at 8:07:42 AM MST
To: "Immelt, Stephen J."
Subject: Re: Follow up
Hi Steve,
I am still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, for us to have a more
specific conversation about compensation before I meet with him. I don't want to put the cart before the horse,
but as I mentioned, this would be a big move for me, and it would have to make sense economically in addition
to being the right move for other reasons we have discussed.
I hope you are well. Cannot believe that Christie endorsed Trump!
Best,
Kathy
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 25, 2016, at 5:23 AM, Immelt, Stephen J. > wrote:
Kathy
I don't want to pester you, but in the hope that you are still intrigued, I wanted to suggest that we try to set up
an opportunity for you to meet Michael Davison, our global head of litigation. MlIchael is an International
Arbitration specialist based in London and a key player. He is also a lot of fun, notwithstanding his Scottish
upbringing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026376
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents