Fwd: Re
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releasePeople & organizations named in this document
Being named here is not an accusation of wrongdoing.
Document text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
From: Steve Bannon [as
Sent: 6/23/2018 12:44:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: Re:
Attachments: image001.png; image002.png; image003.png; image004.png
Importance: — High
Big deal
Begin forwarded message:
Resent-From:
From: "Rivkin, David"
Date: June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT
Subject: Fwd: Re:
Here it is.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Grossman, Andrew M" {jaa
Date: June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT
Subject: Re:
Mueller’s Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
It makes no difference how honorable he 1s. His investigation 1s tainted by the bias that
attended its origin in 2016.
By
David B. Rivkin Jr. and
Elizabeth Price Foley
June 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET
414 COMMENTS
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation may face a serious legal obstacle: It is tainted by
antecedent political bias. The June 14 report from Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department’s
inspector general, unearthed a pattern of anti-Trump bias by high-ranking officials at the Federal
Bureau of Investigation. Some of their communications, the report says, were “not only indicative of a
biased state of mind but imply a willingness to take action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral
prospects.” Although Mr. Horowitz could not definitively ascertain whether this bias “directly
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026273
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents