Re: Mechanisms for learning

From: Joscha Bach a | Sent: 7/24/2016 5:23:46 AM To: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Subject: Re: Mechanisms for learning Importance: — High Average humans are probably not fully able to learn how to program etc. Fraction of people that reshape the world are at the right end of the Bell curves, so difference in variation means fewer women. We tend to be more interested in the outliers. Have people explicitly evolved to be not to be too smart on average, or is general intelligence so hard to get from human brains? Am 24.07.2016 um 00:20 schrieb jeffrey E. <[email protected]>: the average is the only thing that matters On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Joscha Bach {> wrote: Am 23.07.2016 um 04:41 schrieb jeffrey E. <[email protected]>: Cells seem to be mostly indistinguishable (except for XX), I thought? Size is different on average, but males with small brains are still male. Variation of all traits is higher for males, so there are more high IQ men (wider bell-curve). Given average brain size difference, the small difference in average IQ is surprising, I think gender differenece. unlikely motivational. every cell is different. size is didfferent. . the more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human" cell: the body the membrane, . the organizm the colletcions and interactions of brains. wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money used as signals. as is spoken language.. what does social behavior mean , it is the cooridiation of indiv brains. = I think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they are all math , then political correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of thoughts. its not emotinal for me. most people have censorship built in at a deep level, social reasoning gets to different results than equivalent abstract reasoning On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Joscha Bach wrote: Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025960