Re: Results

From: Al seckel [aseckel@ yahoo.com] Sent: 12/16/2010 1:20:06 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] Subject: Re: Results Importance: — High you can call as 1 am obviously (iim From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Al seckel < > Sent: Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM Subject: Re: Results I was never told never, that there was a 10k fee per month,, you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then another 10. then another 10. . On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Al seckel <i wrote: Jeffrey, The bots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article left on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to move, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the top. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent. Toxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now removed. Wikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, Promotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing and wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success. We pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google search. We have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material. And, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, especially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add new content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped down (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push Huffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google search are not of your mug shot, etc. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022223