non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO —

Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 89 able to get information from because he was invoking the Fifth, had refused or declined to file an answer to that complaint. Rather than deny the allegations, he had ultimately, it's my understanding -- I don't have inside information and I'm not trying to waive any information, but my understanding is that rather than answer the complaint, he settled the case through the payment of some kind of compensation that Jane Doe 102 found desirable for dropping her claim. The other thing that I found interesting is that Josefsburg's partner, I believe it is, Miss Isell (indicating) , had been to some of the depositions of, for example, I believe Juan Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez. I believe at least one of those, and perhaps both of those. And she had asked questions about Alan Dershowitz in those depositions, but had not asked questions about other academics in those depositions. So that led me to conclude that Bob Josefsburg and his outstanding law firm had identified Alan Dershowitz as someone who had information relevant -- and let's be clear, this is not a lawsuit about some contract dispute or ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021912