non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO —

Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 45 the clock or anything, but let's get this moving along so we can get your questions answered. Q. I just need to make my record on that. SO we are going to put aside Virginia Roberts. A. Okay. Q. And I'm not talking about attorneys here talking about -- what I'm talking about is people who could be witnesses, people who saw things, people did things, heard things, people who have evidence that would be admissible in court. Do you have that in mind? A. Okay. Q. As of December 30th, 2014, putting aside Miss Roberts, as to whom you've refused to answer, had anyone who fits that category of a person with personal knowledge of admissible evidence told you that Alan Dershowitz had abused any other minors? MR. SCAROLA: I'm going to instruct you not to answer that question on the basis of the attorney/client and work product privileges. MR. SIMPSON: The Knowledge -- let me ask this way. MR. SCAROLA: Let me explain. It might be helpful to you if I were to explain the basis of my objection. ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021868