non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO —
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releaseDocument text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =|
NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S|
non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO —
11
for a purpose other than to advance a cause in
litigation?
A. Sure.
Q. And would you agree with me that it would be
unethical to make allegation of misconduct by a person
in a pleading if that -- if those allegations were not
relevant to the case?
A. Sure.
Q. And would you agree --
A. Actually, not pertinent to the case.
Q. Not pertinent to the case?
A. Yeah. And when you say not relevant,
obviously, reasonable people can have disagreements
about what allegations are relevant to the case or not.
Q. And my question is that an attorney, it would
be unethical, do you agree, for an attorney to sign a
pleading where the attorney does not have a good-faith
basis that the allegations of misconduct are relevant to
the case, are pertinent to the case?
A. Pertinent to the case, and as I understand
for example under rule 11, the requirement is that the
allegations being advanced must not be frivolous.
Q. And that there's a good-faith basis for them?
A. Well, I mean if you're talking about good
faith frivolity, those are I mean, potentially different
ROUGH DRAFT ONLY
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021834
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents