Economic Policy—Short-Term vs. Long-Term
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releaseDocument text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
Economic Policy—Short-Term vs. Long-Term
¢ Economic theory + experience of the Great Depression suggest
government can use fiscal policy (increase direct spending +
investment) to offset near-term shortfalls in private demand.
¢ In the long term, USA Inc. cannot sustain higher levels of direct
spending / investment without crowding out private consumption /
investment.
¢ Therefore, USA Inc. should prioritize and allocate available
resources to stimulate growth in productivity + employment, which
drive long-term GDP growth.
www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 363
Improving Employment, Productivity, & Hours Worked Are Source of
Sustainable Long-Term GDP Growth
USA Long-Term
GDP Growth'
(1970-2009)
2.83%
Hours Worked
Per Worker
-0.22%
Has Been Consistent
At ~39-40 Hours per Week
Note: 1) all growth numbers are rounded average annual growth rates and are adjusted for inflation. 2.83% is the average annual GDP growth rate from 1970 to
2009, per BEA. Labor force growth of 1.53% is the average annual growth rate from 1970 to 2009, per BLS. Hours worked per worker per OECD. Productivity
growth of 1.53% is calculated by subtracting employment growth and hours worked per worker growth from real GDP growth. Average annual growth rate of 1.53%
is roughly in line with other estimates such as Dale W. Jorgenson, Mun S. Ho, Kevin J. Stiroh, “Growth of U.S. Industries and Investments in Information Technology
and Higher Education” <hitp:/Avww.nber.org/chapters/c1 0627>
(@ www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 364
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021023
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents