Document

Restructure Medicare & Medicaid: Economic Factors —

Ref IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020989.txt Release House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pages

Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.

View the original on the official release

People & organizations named in this document

Being named here is not an accusation of wrongdoing.

Document text

Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.

Restructure Medicare & Medicaid: Economic Factors — Employer and Government Funding System Separates Consumers from True Costs of Healthcare e When one doesn’t pay directly and gets an expensive good / service for free (or well below cost), one tends to consume more - it’s basic supply and demand economics. e Count up the subsidies: — Medicaid: 47 million (24MM children / 12MM low-income adults / 7MM disabled / 4MM elderly) Americans (15% of population) each received $6,872 in taxpayer funds, on average, for healthcare in 2008 through Medicaid. That $6,872 equals ~19% of annual per-capita income for Americans. — Medicare: 45 million elderly Americans (15% of population) averaged $7,991 per person for healthcare in 2008 ($4,875 for hospital care; $3,116 for medical insurance and prescription drugs). That equals ~23% of annual per capita income. — Private Market: 157mm Americans with private health coverage (subsidized by employers) in 2008 paid just 16% of the total premium cost themselves for single coverage and 27% for family coverage. In effect, that represented tax- free “earnings” of $3,951 for singles or $9,256 for families (not including the tax savings on their personal premium contributions). Source: Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (@)E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 295 Restructure Medicare & Medicaid: Economic Factors— Healthcare Providers Are Rewarded for Driving Revenue ¢ While striving to provide the best care possible, healthcare providers tend to have financial / legal / societal incentives to provide more care, all else equal. ¢« Reimbursement for providers is generally volume-based (e.g., more procedures generate more revenue for care providers), though there are efforts to increasingly focus on quality. Unlike car buyers, for example, who often disregard a dealer’s maxed-out model and choose only the features that are important to them and what they can afford, healthcare buyers tend to buy all the “features” as: 1) buyers (patients in this case) are typically not medical experts, so they defer to doctors / care providers for decisions; and 2) buyers only bear a small portion of the costs as someone else (employer or government) is paying for the features. KP www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 296 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020989

Have a question about what this document contains?

Ask the documents